The excess Nitrogen that remains in the plant/crops can also cause health issues

Although the water flux for freshwater extraction stop is encouraging, the rate of absorbing water using hydrogel is significantly slower than other draw agents. To improve performance, the team envisioned running numerous desalting sponges in parallel, and further investigations need to be conducted. Overall, since the average salinity of seawater is 35 ppt, which is around 17 times more than the saline used in the test , it shows a promising application in seawater desalination on a lower NaCl concentration.There are many factors affecting the efficiency of forward osmosis, such as concentration polarization, membrane fouling, reverse solute diffusion, membrane development, and draw solution design. Concentration polarization is the most important factor among all of them. Various studies conducted regarding forward osmosis, these studies share an identical focus, which is reducing concentration polarization. The existence of concentration polarization can weaken the actual osmotic pressure difference on both sides of the membrane, which is one of the limiting factors that affect the performance of forward osmosis in water flux recovery. Pressure retarded osmosis has been defined as osmosis through asymmetric membranes. Most forward osmosis membranes used are either an asymmetric structure membrane including an active layer/a porous support layer , or symmetric structure membrane . There are two types of concentration polarizations based on the placement of the membranes: external concentration polarization and internal concentration polarization . External concentration polarization and internal concentration polarization can be further categorized into two sub-categories: dilutive and concentrative. In general applications, forward osmosis membranes are commonly placed in a way that the active layer faces feed solution,fodder growing system and the support layer faces the draw solution.

One of the exceptions is touse forward osmosis with the function of damping osmotic pressure. In this membrane orientation, when the solution is drawn from the feed solution and enters the active layer to the support layer, the feed solution can be diluted in the pores of the support layer and its surface, thus causing dilutive external concentration polarization and dilutive internal concentration polarization respectively. To be more concise, the solution that lingers in the support layer has greater osmotic pressure than that of the feed solution. When the solute from the process is transported by porous support and active layer, it can further dilute the outlier of the draw solution, causing dilutive external concentration polarization. Selecting a good draw solution is crucial for the FO process. The ideal DS should have high solubility, high osmotic pressure, and stability. Non-toxicity of the draw solution has little to no effects on the performance and structure of the FO membrane. There are three categories of DS that are generally recognized: inorganic DS, organic DS, and other DS such as nanoparticles. Currently, inorganic draw solutions are most widely used in FO technology. They usually have extremely high osmotic pressure due to the small inorganic molecular mass and high solubility, which makes them more favorable in dealing with hypersaline wastewater. However, in the reverse osmosis process, the inorganic draw solution could increase the salinity of the feed solution. The mainstream of inorganic DS is ammonium bicarbonate and sodium chloride. In 2005, McCutcheon and Elimelech et al. conducted forward osmosis experiments using ammonium bicarbonate as the draw solution and achieved ideal results; through heating, ammonia-carbon dioxide can be regenerated. Nevertheless, there can still be a certain amount of ammonia gas present in the water. As a result, in more practical applications and pilot-scale tests, ammonium bicarbonate is the most widely used draw agent.

Ammonia and carbon dioxide are evaporated in the form of gas, which is effective for recovery and re-concentration. Since the ammonium bicarbonate extraction and recovery system can make full use of low-grade waste heat and reduce energy consumption, it is especially practical for places with available waste heat, such as thermal power plants, and regions with abundant solar.As the population increases rapidly, the demand for irrigation raises correspondingly. Almost 70% of the global water is used to irrigate. At the same time, freshwater demand is raising, water reuse treatment process and drinking water treatment process became vital technologies nowadays. Under most situations, wastewater reuse and seawater reuse are a large portion of the water reuse system. However, brackish groundwater reuse became an emergent freshwater resource recently. Brackish groundwater is often located at depths of 4,000 feet or deeper under the Earth’s surface, and it has a dissolved concentration between 1,000 to 10,000 milligrams per liter . Brackish groundwater could be used for power generation, aquaculture, industry, and public drinking water supply. There are profuse brackish groundwater resources located in the United States, including Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Virginia, Nevada, Texas, California, Idaho, and Colorado. For instance, Texas has an estimation of 2.7 billion acre-feet of brackish groundwater; In New Mexico, 75 percent of the groundwater is too saline to use without any treatment. According to what has been discussed previously, there are bountiful resources of brackish groundwater in the United States, and one of the common implements of treated brackish groundwater is direct fertigation since there are lavish nutrients in the groundwater. The combination of nanofiltration and fertilizer drawn forward osmosis is an ideal solution for brackish groundwater treatment. Since brackish groundwater has a relatively low total dissolved solid , it requires minor desalination and nutrient removal processes before direct fertigation.

To maintain a qualified number of nutrient components in brackish groundwater for direct fertigation, researchers have compared different models combining nanofiltration and forward osmosis. The first model is fertilizer drawn forward osmosis alone without nanofiltration, the results have shown that treated water samples still contain excessive nutrients for plant growth, which indicates that the water quality would not qualify for direct fertigation. The second model applies Nanofiltration as a pre-treatment. This model can remove most of the scaling and organic fouling species, enhancing the performance of fertilizer drawn forward osmosis. However, scaling became one of the major issues due to the excess amount of scaling ions . The third model applies nanofiltration as posttreatment, this system not only has the highest reduction rate of fertilizer nutrients but is also able to recycle the excess nutrients for further reuse as draw solutions. For all the models above, researchers applied an NE90 membrane with an MWCO of 220kDa. Generally, a1KDa MWCO refers to about 1.3 nm in membrane pore size, whereas 220KDa corresponds to a pore size of 3.84 nm. Out of variousfertilizers were tested, ammonium phosphate monobasic , ammonium sulfate ,chicken fodder system and mono-potassium phosphate have the highest reduction rates of nitrogen. Research has shown that ammonium sulfate contains the highest water recovery rate at 76%. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate has a second ranking water flux recovery of up to 75% while ammonium phosphate monobasic shows the lowest nutrient concentration among three of them. FDFO demonstrates its potential with fertilizer draw solution, which acts as a low-energy osmotic dilution. Researchers also proved that most fertilizers can be used as draw solutions, different combinations of various draw solutions can have numerous removal rates for a certain nutrient. . For instance, the combination of KCI and NH4H2PO4 can result in a lower concentration of N/P/K , which shows a higher nutrient removal rate than using KCI or NH4H2PO4 individually as draw solution. Moreover, different draw solutions /fertilizers have different rejection rates of nitrogen compounds. For example, Urea has a lower rejection rate compared to ionic compounds, such as nitrate and ammonium. This phenomenon indicates that Urea may have a higher nitrogen organic removal rate after ammonification. It is proven that the hybrid system of fertilizer drawn forward osmosis with nanofiltration as a post-treatment has the most effective removal rates of nutrients when it comes to brackish groundwater treatment. When nanofiltration is applied as pre-treatment, the system has a higher removal rate on scaling precursor ions and organic fouling species treating brackish groundwater. When nanofiltration is served as post-treatment, the nitrogen removal rate is the highest compared to the FO alone without NF and NF applied as a pre-treatment. The system can also recycle excess nutrients for further reuse as draw solutions when NF is applied as a post treatment. The water flux is analogously higher when this hybrid treatment process is orientated as pressure-retarded osmosis instead of normal forward osmosis mode.

Integration of nanofiltration with fertilizer drawn forward osmosis can reduce the nutrient concentration to meet the water quality standard for direct fertigation. It brings the nitrogen input in fertigation to a lower scale compared to the standard scale. This hybrid system can also adjust the input of different nutrients for varied types of crops/situations. The sources of N2O are mainly from microbial processes in soil and oxidation of NH3 in fertilizer. This research focuses on exploring the agricultural factors and providing solutions to the issue of redundant N2O emissions. At the same time, managing these controllable factors can reduce agricultural emissions by applying water treatment methods. Since California contributes 12% of the national food production, reducing N2O emissions could have a consequential effect on air quality and public health. Studies show that exposure to long-term N2O would cause ebbed lung function and asthma, especially to young ages. People that live nearby farms have a higher risk of getting respiratory diseases. Moreover, accession of N2O in water is caused by the excess nutrient runoff to the river. According to this review, N2O emissions can be reduced significantly by managing the fertigation nitrogen input appropriately. Consequently, the air quality and water quality could be improved by reducing Nitrous oxide emissions. A higher Nitrogen input fertilizer could increase the loss of certain plant species and the death of marine organisms. At the same time, low-nitrogen fertilizer would not be as nutritious as nitrogen fertilizer, it might slow down the growth rates of plants and crops. Since fertigation is commonly used in agriculture, relatively low nitrogen input could have a negative impact on the efficiency of crop production. As a result, the nitrogen amount in fertigation should be controlled to a certain amount to maintain the balance. Besides the dinitrogen and nitric oxide emission from soil denitrification, agricultural Nitrous oxide emission has the dominant contribution to the total greenhouse gas emission. According to previous studies, Nitrate oxide is 300 times more harmful than carbon dioxide towards climate change. Nitrate oxides in the atmosphere contained 270 parts per billion in 1750, and it has increased to 331 parts billion in 2018. The increasing rate of Nitrate oxide in the atmosphere breaks the record every 5 years. In the year 2021, the global temperature increased conspicuously, one of the reasons is the overt Nitrate oxides emission since the food demand is rising every year with the population growth. This review explores the relationship between agricultural factors of N2O emissions and water treatment solutions. The result of this review shows that agricultural N2Oemission is related to different factors including soil oxygen content, soil porosity, soil organic carbon content, soil temperature, PH value of soil, soil bacteria content, and Nitrogen input in soil. By adjusting these external factors, including limiting the supplement of oxygen, reducing soil water content, choosing the soil with a lower porosity , increasing the soil PH values, increasing the soil organic carbon content, etc., lowering the nitrogen input to prevent over-fertilization could be the most effective solution. As a result, the agricultural N2O emissions decrease spontaneously. Nitrous oxide has different impacts on the atmosphere. In the stratosphere, N2O depletes ozone levels by acting with halogen oxides. In the troposphere, N2O is one of the paths depleting ozone. Over 3500 measurements of N2O existences in surface water and marine troposphere, the exactitude for tropospheric, surface water, and marine measurement are 0.3%, 1.2%, and 2.2%. These numbers indicate that almost two-thirds of the worldwide flux of N2O in the atmosphere derives from sources in the northern hemisphere. Data from surface water proposes that the oceanic flux of N2O would be less than 60 Gmol/year. Deep water N2O concentration is estimated using the values of salinity of water, water temperature, water oxygen content, and the water dissolved nitrogen content. Raise of N2O concentration in water is caused by anthropogenic nitrate denitrification, resulting in tremendous depletion of marine life, especially in deep water.

Farmers who are motivated by sustainability are also likely to seek out these programs

Examples include cover cropping, water conservation, erosion control, integrated pest management, or organic certification. Although the level of abstraction might be conceptualized as a continuum, this simple categorization is useful for analysis. Another way of thinking about this categorization is that goals are value-driven outcomes of sustainability and strategies represent beliefs about the means to achieving those goals . Hypothesis 2 is that mental models of sustainable agriculture will reflect geographic variation and local context. Differences in farmer knowledge and the practice of agriculture reflect regional biophysical and social differences . In particular, although abstract goals of sustainability are likely to be more universal across geographies, the concrete strategies used to achieve those goals may reflect geographical variation in terms of challenges and opportunities for realizing the goals . For example, achieving the goal of environmental responsibility in the Napa Valley requires water management and cover-crop strategies for reducing soil erosion by surface water runoff on steep hillsides. In Lodi, strategies for wind-born soil erosion control are more relevant across the gentle valley floor topography of the region. Hypothesis 3 is that farmers who subscribe to more central concepts in the mental model are also more likely to engage in a range of sustainability behaviors. In particular, the sophistication of a farmer’s definition of sustainability should be correlated with their participation in extension programs and adoption of sustainability practices. The extension programs in California viticulture explicitly train farmers in the idea of sustainability and also identify specific sustainability practices. Thus, participation, practices,dutch bucket hydroponic and mental models represent a set of coevolving and synergistic processes.We constructed a mental model based on responses to surveys of wine grape growers in all three study regions.

Using content analysis of farmersself-reported definitions of sustainability , we classified 56 concepts into 19 abstract goals of sustainability and 37 more concrete strategies. We operationalized the mental model as a network where the concepts are nodes and valued ties represent the number of times two concepts co-occur together in a single definition of sustainable agriculture . We first identified an overall mental model by taking the union of the regional concept networks. A union network is defined as the combination of nodes and ties from two or more networks . The union network provides a comprehensive picture of farmer thinking about sustainable agriculture. The overall mental model from the union network is visualized in Fig. 1. Nodes are scaled by a measure of centrality we call prominence,which indicates a concepts importance in the mental model. Prominent concepts are widely recognized among farmers as legitimate dimensions of sustainability and they are cognitively associated with many other central concepts. Technically, prominence combines the frequency that a concept appears in the network with its centrality . Because prominent concepts are linked to many other concepts, they are effective cognitive entry points for leveraging farmer thinking about sustainability. Ties are unscaled. Nodes are shaded by classification, with yellow-colored nodes representing goals of sustainable agriculture and aqua-colored nodes representing strategies. Table S1 lists all of the concepts, examples of coded text for each concept, classification as goal or strategy , and three measures of centrality: prominence, occurrence probability, and eigenvector centrality. We chose the examples of coded text that best illustrate the core ideas of the concept.Our mental model analysis identified key concepts that are factored into a practitioners decision-making process. The goals of economic viability, environmental responsibility, continuation into the future, and crop value are powerful drivers of decision making, with relevance across different social-ecological contexts. The hierarchical structure of the overall mental model suggests that although practitioners focus on achieving a common set of broad goals, the strategies they associate with realizing them are numerous and diverse.

Key strategies include practice adoption, stewardship of resources, reduction or elimination of agrochemicals, and water conservation and quality enhancement. Because of their association with many other goals and strategies, central concepts are potential cognitive entry points for leveraging practitioner thinking about sustainability.Sustainability is notoriously difficult to define for the reason that it is a relative concept , which varies widely across space, time, and scale . Furthermore, diverse stakeholders often have divergent and even conflicting values and goals . Practitioners must grapple with the questions of what is to be sustained, for how long, for whose benefit, at what cost, over what geographical area, and measured by what criteria . We argue that definitions of sustainability that are grounded in practitionersviewpoints will have greater relevance to real-world contexts and therefore be more useful for guiding actions . Empirically measuring mental models of sustainability is crucial to know whether the normative ideas about sustainability discussed within academic, policy, and public circles are relevant to on-the-ground decisions. Our study of mental models provided two main insights into practitionersdefinitions of sustainability. First, mental models of sustainability are organized hierarchically along a continuum of abstractness from general goals of sustainability to concrete strategies for achieving those goals. At least among wine grape growers, the overall mental model is sophisticated and reflects many of the concepts discussed in the academic literature and among policymakers . Definitions that focus on central goals are likely to prompt practitioner thinking about their linked strategies, and are more likely to resonate with a greater number and diversity of practitioners. To the extent these goals and strategies are grounded in more general environmental values and norms, the network approach used here emphasizes the interdependent and relational aspects of sustainability thinking. Second, more central abstract concepts are universal across geography, with only anecdotal evidence that strategies are customized to specific social-ecological contexts.

This may be a feature of our study system because sustainability extension programs are advanced within California viticulture and wine grape-growing regions that have more similarities than differences. Mental models from social-ecological systems with more stark differences may show larger differences in how goals are linked to strategies. More research is needed to confirm or disconfirm the hypothesis that concrete strategies are more sensitive to geographic and other contextual variation.Managing knowledge systems to link knowledge and action is a core goal in sustainability science . Knowledge systems include the institutional arrangements, organizations, and social networks that facilitate the transmission of knowledge among decision makers. Our results suggest that knowledge about sustainability, participation in extension programs, and practice adoption are mutually reinforcing processes. In agriculture, local extension programs and partnerships have played a crucial role in managing knowledge systems . In the case of California viticulture specifically, there is a substantial body of literature demonstrating that these programs have had a positive influence on farmer adoption of sustainability practices . The positive association we found between farmer sustainability cognition, participation in extension activities, and practice adoption indicates that knowledge systems do help expand practitioner understanding of social-ecological systems and influence their management behaviors. Extension programs can accelerate the development of knowledge and understanding about sustainability by clarifying the linkages among central sustainability goals and the associated strategies and practices for achieving them. An important component of this learning process may be the explicit use of the concept of sustainability,dutch buckets system as it can serve as a heuristic for guiding practitioner decision making with a framework for balancing economic, ecological, and social costs and benefits. Thinking in terms of sustainability does track with behavior, and knowledge systems have the ability to support this process by providing opportunities for learning.Sustainability and climate-focused initiatives announced by the United States federal government, states, and private sector entities could have meaningful impacts on land use sectors by affecting trends in land use and management as well as shifting commodity markets. Recent policy announcements include potential land-based greenhouse-gas mitigation strategies associated with ambitious new climate targets as part of rejoining the Paris Agreement , as well as a recent presidential executive order protecting 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030. The US Department of Agriculture Innovation Initiative has established ambitious targets for the next three decades to increase agricultural productivity by 40%, reduce food waste by 50%, reduce nutrient loss to run of by 30%, reduce carbon emissions, and increase biofuel and biomass production.Other policies may not have a primary objective that is environmental or sustainability-focused, but could nonetheless support policies in this domain by shifting resource demands and improving environmental outcomes. Two examples of indirect policy objectives that could interact with sustainability and climate initiatives include enhancing agricultural productivity growth and promoting healthier diets. If widely adopted, U.S. government recommendations for healthier diets could alter protein consumption away from beef and pork and toward plant-based foods, which could indirectly benefit climate and sustainability goals . Furthermore, previous research suggests that agricultural productivity growth can complement climate change mitigation . However, it is unclear how these policy targets could be achieved in isolation, what role market adjustments will play, and how healthier diet transitions and agricultural productivity enhancement might interact.While there have been several recent studies examining combinations of sustainability-related U.S. policy targets , the literature modeling U.S. agriculture and forestry is currently lacking in its representation of demand-side sustainability policies, including transitions to healthier diets.

While shifting to healthier diets is critical to reducing the noncommunicable disease burden , understanding how dietary change could shift resource-intensive commodity production, land use and ecosystem services can help inform complementary sustainability and climate policy actions. U.S. food systems are characterized by high levels of grain and oil seed production to support a highly productive domestic livestock sector and domestic diets that are relatively rich in meat-based proteins and oils , as well as international demands for U.S.-sourced agricultural products. Sustainability priorities such as increasing biodiversity protection or ecosystem service provision could benefit from dietary shifts that reduce pressure on U.S. agriculture’s intensive and extensive margins. Simultaneously, increasing productivity growth in U.S. agriculture could increase incomes and increase comparative advantage for international trade, which may or may not have land sparing effects. The literature on environmental impact of human diets has converged on the multiple sustainability benefits of diets lower in animal-based foods and higher in plant-based foods . These studies have either examined the global impacts of all countries adopting more sustainable or healthier diets or the domestic impacts of changes to a single country’s dietary preferences . Rarely have studies quantified both domestic and global sustainability metrics of a single county’s dietary changes or the country-specific sustainability impacts of the rest of the world adopting healthier diets. In addition, many studies focus on quantifying the impacts of specific personal dietary preferences , rather than a healthier average national diet. Several studies in the U.S. have quantified the sustainability impacts of omnivorous healthy diets recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans . However, there is significant disagreement about whether the DGA diets have lower GHG, land use, or water use than the average American diet today . A handful of these studies have reported slightly lower land use requirements , and three out of four available studies showed similar or greater GHG emissions . The majority of studies quantifying the sustainability of alternative diets and dietary shifts in the U.S. use life-cycle assessments to measure environmental impacts of food production chains . However, LCA studies are limited in being able to quantify land use and land use change and allow for regional variation . Moreover, for projecting the environmental impacts of future dietary changes, it is critical to provide estimates that represent dynamic, rather than steady-state, industry and economic conditions.Alternative approaches such as economic partial-equilibrium models represent the agricultural, forestry, and other land use sectors in detail, and are deliberately designed to estimate land-use-related impacts, a key gap in the existing literature on the sustainability of U.S. diets . The global scale of many of these models allows representation of international trade and thus evaluation of leakage effects of domestic policies. Indirect sustainability levers such as shifting dietary preferences have received substantially less attention in the land use modeling literature relative to carbon pricing , bioenergy, and traditional conservation incentives. However, recent analysis has started to move in this direction . Partial-equilibrium models of the land sectors, such as GLOBIOM, which we employ in this study, are designed to maintain empirically observed market relationships between supply, demand, and prices. These models endogenously determine the demand for certain foods, productivity of specific crops, and the productivity of the livestock sector.

The isotope-labeling was reversed in replicate experiments to minimize false positives

In order to elucidate the biochemical mechanism of BZS1 function, we performed a SILIAIP-MS analysis of the BZS1 protein complex. We transformed Arabidopsis with a construct that over expresses a BZS1 protein fused with the yellow fluorescence protein at the C-terminus driven by the constitutive 35S promoter . A transgenic line that showed mild dwarf and dark-green-leaf phenotypes, resembling the bzs1-D mutant , was selected for the analysis. Pair-wised comparison was designed to seperately compare BZS1-YFP and 35S::YFP transgenic plants with non-transgenic wild type, to determine proteins associated with BZS1-YFP and YFP alone, respectively. To obtain complete 15nitrogen labeling of young seedlings, we first grew BZS1-YFP, YFP and wild-type plants hydroponically in medium containing 15N, and obtained stable isotope-labeled seeds . These 15N-labeled seeds and regular 14N seeds were grown again on corresponding 15N or 14N medium to obtain 5-day-old seedlings for further analysis . For each pair of isotope-labeled sample and control, equal amount of tissues was mixed, and the protein extract was used for immuno precipitation using the GFPtrap beads. The immuno precipitated proteins were separated in SDS-PAGE, gel bands were in-gel digested, and the tryptic peptides were analyzed by mass spectrometry . Mass spectrometry analyses of the two BZS1-YFP immuno precipitation experiments identified 514 and 383 proteins, respectively, with 279 proteins identified in both repeats . A smaller number of proteins were identified in the YFP experiments . Quantitation of isotope ratios showed median ratios of 1.16 and 1.23 for the two BZS1-YFP experiments,planting gutter and 1.0 and 0.92 for the two YFP control experiments. The protein ratios of the YFP control datasets had standard deviation of 0.23 and 0.57 .

Using 2× median as cutoff, 16 proteins were enriched in BZS1-YFP compared to wild-type control in the two repeat experiments. The YFP and wild type comparison identified 2 proteins that were enriched over 2× median, presumably due to association with YFP or false discovery, suggesting a false discovery rate <0.8% . The 15 proteins enriched by BZS1-YFP were not enriched by YFP alone, and thus were considered BZS1-associated proteins . Among the BZS1-associated proteins are COP1 and HY5, two key regulators of the light signaling pathways, as well as BZS1/BBX20’s homologs STH2/BBX21 and STO/BBX24 . To verify the interaction between BZS1 and COP1 in vivo, we performed immuno precipitation of BZS1-YFP from the BZS1-YFP transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings using anti-GFP antibody, and probed the immunoblot with anti-COP1 antibody. The results showed that COP1 co-immuno precipitates with BZS1-YFP , confirming that BZS1 interacts with COP1 in plants. Consistent with BZS1’s interaction with the COP1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, the immuno precipitated BZS1-YFP can be detected by anti-ubiquitin antibody, and the level of ubiquitination was increased by treatment with proteasome inhibitor MG132 . We further confirmed the direct interaction of BZS1 and HY5 by yeast two-hybrid assays . Further, when transiently co-expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana, the BZS1-myc protein was co-immuno precipitated by the HY5-YFP protein , confirming their interaction in plant cells. Similarly, the STH2-myc protein was co-immuno precipitated by BZS1-YFP . These results confirmed the SILIA-IP-MS results that BZS1 interacts with COP1, HY5, and STH2/BBX21. To determine the functional relationship between BZS1 and HY5, we first compared previously published transcriptomic data from BZS1-overexpression plants with chromatin immuno precipitation-microarray data of HY5 direct target genes . The result showed that 56.3% of BZS1-activated genes are HY5 targets while only 13% of BZS1-repressed genes are HY5 targets . Such significant overlap betweenBZS1-activated and HY5-bound genes suggests that BZS1 interacts with HY5 to activate gene expression.

Fusing a transcription repressor domain, such as the SRDX domain, to a transcription activator has been shown to have a dominant negative effect . Over expression of the BZS1-SRDX fusion sequence driven by 35S promotor in Arabidopsis caused a long-hypocotyl phenotype and reduced anthocyanin accumulation , which were similar to the phenotypes of loss-of-function mutant hy5-215 but opposite to the phenotypes caused by BZS1 over expression, further supporting that BZS1 functions as a transcription activator together with HY5. The BZS1-SRDX plants grown in the dark did not show any obvious phenotype , consistent with HY5 and BZS1 being degraded in the dark. To further investigate whether BZS1 function requires HY5, we crossed BZS1-YFP with hy5-215. The BZS1-YFP/hy5-215 plants showed similar phenotypes of long hypocotyls and low anthocyanin accumulation as hy5-215 , demonstrating that BZS1 activity requires HY5. Interestingly, the BZS1-YFP protein accumulates at a higher level in the hy5-215 mutant than in wild-type background , suggesting that HY5 negatively regulates BZS1 accumulation while required for BZS1 function. On the other hand, the RNA levels of HY5 and HYH are higher in BZS1-YFP line but lower in BZS1-SRDX seedlings as compared with those in wild type . Immunoblot analysis also confirmed that the HY5 protein level was increased in the BZS1-YFP line and reduced in the BZS1-SRDX line . These results indicated that BZS1 and HY5 proteins not only interact directly, but also influence each other’s protein abundance. A previous study showed that HY5 is required for SL inhibition of hypocotyl elongation. The HY5 protein level is increased by SL treatment and the hypocotyl elongation of hy5 is partially insensitive to SL . Since BZS1’s function is dependent on HY5 in the light, we examined if BZS1 is also involved in SL signaling. As reported previously , treatment with 1 μM GR24, an analog of SL, dramatically inhibited the hypocotyl elongation of wild-type seedlings but had no effect on the SL insensitive mutant max2-3 . We found that the hypocotyl elongation of BZS1-SRDX seedlings was partially insensitive to GR24, similar to the hy5-215 mutant.

The GR24 treatment decreased the hypocotyl length of wild-type seedlings by about 72% compared to the untreated control, but only by about 17% for hy5-215 and 30% for the BZS1-SRDX seedlings . GR24 also increased the chlorophyll content in wild-type plants by about 24%, but had no significant effect in max2-3, hy5-215 and BZS1- SRDX seedlings . Additionally, GR24 induced HY5 accumulation in wild-type background but not in the BZS1-SRDX seedlings . These results indicated that, like HY5, BZS1 also plays an important role in SL regulation of hypocotyl elongation and chlorophyll accumulation. We then tested if SL regulates the expression of BZS1/BBX20 and its homologs. Real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis showed that GR24 increased the expression level of BZS1/BBX20 mRNA in wild type, but not in the max2-3 mutant . Interestingly, expression levels of other members of BBX IV family, including STH2/ BBX21, were not dramatically affected by GR24. Immunoblot analysis confirmed that GR24 treatment increased the levels of the BZS1-myc protein expressed from the BZS1 native promoter and the BZS1-YFP protein expressed from the constitutive 35S promoter, suggesting that SL regulates BZS1 at both transcriptional and post transcriptional levels . These results indicated that BZS1 plays a positive role in SL signaling downstream of MAX2 at the early stage of seedling development. Seedling development is crucial for establishment of life for a plant, and is thus highly responsive to a wide range of environmental and hormonal signals. The signaling pathways that transduce these signals are highly integrated at the molecular level to ensure coherent cellular responses and optimal growth according to environmental condition and endogenous physiology . This study uncovers additional mechanisms for such signal integration. Our quantitative proteomic analysis of the BZS1 complex reveals BZS1’s interaction with HY5,gutter berries as well as provides direct evidence for in planta BZS1-COP1 interaction. Genetic analyses using over expression and dominant negative loss-of-function transgenic plants demonstrate that BZS1 interacts with HY5 to activate gene expression and promote photomorphogenesis. Further, we find that BZS1 also mediates SL regulation of HY5 level and hypocotyl elongation. Together with previous finding of BZS1 function downstream of the BR pathway , our study establishes BZS1 as a key integrator of light, BR, and SL signals for regulating seedling morphogenesis. IP-MS is a powerful method for identification of interacting proteins, which has been widely used in dissecting signal transduction pathways . With increased sensitivity of modern mass spectrometers, IP-MS tends to identify not only specific interacting proteins but also large numbers of non-specific proteins. Under our experimental conditions, over 300 proteins were identified in each IP-MS analysis. Distinguishing specific from non-specific interactors is challenging without quantitative measurement. SILIA-IP-MS provides an ideal quantitative method for this purpose, as the sample and negative control can be mixed at an early step of the immuno precipitation experiment to avoid technical variations. Indeed, among the large numbers of proteins identified by mass spectrometry, only 29 showed enrichment by the BZS1-YFP fusion protein, and thus were considered BZS1-associated proteins. The interactions of BZS1 with HY5, COP1, and its homolog STH2/BBX21 were confirmed by yeast two-hybrid or coimmuno precipitation assays. Consistent with COP1-mediated ubiquitination of BZS1, our BZS1-interactome data includes ubiquitin and one proteasome activating protein PA200 .

In theory, the ratio between sample and negative control should be infinite for proteins that specifically interact with the bait protein in SILIA-IP-MS. However, due to background signals in the control samples, either from non-specific binding of proteins in immuno precipitation or interfering signals in MS1, the ratios actually distribute within a wide range. For example, Hubner et al. observed that pull-down with Aly-GFP leads to only moderate enrichment because Aly itself binds to control beads as well. In our study, only 2 of the 254 proteins identified in the YFP sample were enriched over 2× median, suggesting that even 2-fold cutoff yields low false discovery rate when two reverse-labeled replicates are used. Our genetic analyses support that BZS1 interacts with HY5 to activate gene expression and promote photomorphogenesis. First, comparison of genome-wide data shows that BZS1 tends to activate, rather than repress, HY5 direct target genes . Second, dominant inactivation of BZS1 causes similar phenotypes as the hy5-215 mutant , supporting that BZS1 and HY5 act in the same or overlapping pathway. Third, the phenotypes of BZS1-YFP plants are suppressed by hy5-215 , confirming that BZS1 functions in a HY5-dependent manner. These results together provide strong evidence for a model that BZS1 interacts with HY5 to activate HY5-bound target genes. BBX proteins contain one or two B-box zinc finger motifs in their N-terminal regions, and are organized into five subfamilies . The fourth subfamily includes eight B-box proteins containing two tandem B-boxes without CCT domain . Our study together with previous studies show that five members of the BBX subfamily IV interact with COP1 and HY5 . Thus, interaction with HY5 seems to be a common mechanism for these B-box proteins to regulate gene expression. Interestingly, BZS1/BBX20, STH2/BBX21 and LZF1/STH3/BBX22 are positive regulators in photomorphogenesis, while BBX19, STO/BBX24 and STH/BBX25 are negative regulators . Our finding of STH2/BBX21 and STO/BBX24 as interactors of BZS1/BBX20 suggests that these factors form hetero-dimers. The dominant negative effect of the BZS1-SRDX fusion indicates that BZS1/BBX20 normally functions as a transcription activator, which is consistent with previous finding that STH2/BBX21 functions as a transcription activator . It has been reported that STO/BBX24 and STH/BBX25 interact with HY5 and most likely inhibit HY5 function by forming inactive heterodimers . Our identification of STO/BBX24 as a BZS1-associated protein suggests another possibility that STO/BBX24 may form a non-functional heterodimer with BZS1/BBX20 and hence inhibit BZS1/BBX20 activity. In addition to direct interaction between BZS1 and HY5 proteins in regulating target gene expression, BZS1 and HY5 also regulate each other’s expression level. BZS1 positively regulates the RNA and protein levels of HY5 . Recent studies have shown that HY5 binds to its own promoter to regulate its own level , thus BZS1 may regulate HY5 transcription through interaction with HY5 protein. In contrast, the BZS1 protein level is increased in hy5-215, suggesting a negative regulation by HY5 at the protein level. HY5 may promote BZS1 degradation by interacting with COP1. Similarly, a previous study showed that the degradation of BBX22 is also promoted by both COP1 and HY5 , whereas BBX22 transcription is directly activated by HY5 and repressed by BBX24 . Such positive and negative regulation between interacting partners potentially contributes to the signaling dynamics during dark-to-light transition and fluctuating light intensities.Our study uncovers a major role for BZS1 in SL response.

Abiotic stress alters the susceptibility of plants to many pathogens

As sessile organisms, plants are presented with numerous biotic challenges such as herbivory and pathogen attack. Plants initiate responses to these challenges by harnessing tightly regulated phytohormone networks. Salicylic acid levels increase in plants following pathogen infection and SA is critical for the development of systemic acquired resistance . There are two enzymatic pathways for the generation of SA: one via phenylalanine ammonia lyase and the other via isochorismate synthase . In tomato , Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana, most pathogen-induced SA appears to be synthesized via the ICS pathway . Plants with compromised SA synthesis or signaling have greatly diminished defenses against pathogens, as is the case with SA-deficient transgenic plants expressing a bacterial salicylate hydroxylase or ICS mutants like sid2 , and mutants in downstream targets of SA such as npr1 . SAR induction by biotic agents coincides with increases in SA levels and a systemic transcriptional reprograming that primes the plant to respond rapidly to minimize the spread or severity of further infections . This transcriptional reprograming includes the expression of pathogenesis-related genes and deployment of peroxidases and other defense factors. In addition to induction by biotic agents, SAR responses are induced by exogenous application of SA to the foliage or roots . Plant activators are chemicals that have no direct antimicrobial activity but induce disease resistance . A number of synthetic compounds have been developed that induce SAR by increasing SA accumulation and/or by acting on downstream targets of SA . For example, the plant activator, probenazole, effective against bacterial, fungal, and oomycete diseases, stimulates SAR by increasing SA levels . 1,2,3-Benzothiadiazole-7-thiocarboxylic acid-S-methyl-ester , sold under the trade name, Actigard,grow bucket stimulates SAR in many plant species without inducing SA accumulation . Tiadinil [TDL; N–4-methyl-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carboxamide] is a plant activator that was registered in Japan in 2003 under the trade name, V-GET. TDL was developed for disease management in rice where it is applied to nursery-grown seedlings for transplanting to production fields . TDL is very effective for control of rice blast disease caused by Magnaporthe oryzae and appears to induce resistance in a manner similar to BTH by acting on downstream targets of SA .

The TDL metabolite,4-methyl-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carboxylic acid, is responsible for the SAR activation .The effect of brief episodes of root stress such as salinity and water deficit at levels that commonly occur in agriculture is well documented in plant–oomycete interactions, wherein stress events predispose plants to levels of inoculum they would normally resist . The phytohormone abscisic acid accumulates rapidly in roots and shoots as an adaptive response to these abiotic stresses, but also contributes to the increased disease proneness of the plants . Antagonism between SA and ABA is well documented in relation to plant defense responses to pathogens . Previously, ABA was found to have an antagonistic effect on SAR which was induced by 1,2-benzisothiazol-3-one1,1-dioxide and BTH in Arabidopsis and tobacco . However, it is not known if plant activators that target SA signaling impact the ABA-mediated susceptibility to root pathogens that occurs following predisposing root stress in tomato. Because of the potential for unwanted trade offs and signaling conflicts in plants exposed to different stresses, as can occur in the field, we investigated how predisposing root stress impacts chemically induced resistance in tomato. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment of tomato seedlings with TDL and BTH on salt-induced predisposition to the foliar bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and to the soil borne oomycete pathogen Phytophthora capsici. TDL is of particular interest in the context of soil borne pathogens such as Phytophthora capsici because it is often applied to plants as a root dip. We also determined the impact of SA, TDL and BTH on ABA accumulation during a predisposing episode of salt stress. The results show that TDL applied to roots strongly protects the leaves from disease caused by Pst in both non-stressed and salt-stressed plants. In contrast, neither TDL nor BTH protects roots from Phytophthora capsici.

The protection induced by plant activators against Pst does not result from reduced ABA accumulation and, although overall disease is less in both non-stressed and salt-stressed plants by chemically induced SAR, plant activators do not reverse the salt-induced increment in disease severity.To determine the effect of SA on ABA accumulation during salt stress, ABA levels were measured in WT plants pre-treated with SA, TDL, or BTH. Following salt stress treatment for 18 h, roots and shoots were collected and immediately frozen in liquid N2.The tissues were lyophilized and placed at −20◦C until extraction. The lyophilized tissue was ground in liquid N2 to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle, 50–100 mg samples were collected, and each sample transferred to a micro-fuge tube. Cold 80% methanol containing butylated hydroxytoluene at 10 μg ml−1 was added to each tube, which was then vortexed. The extracts were placed on ice and agitated occasionally for 30 min. The tubes were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 × g, and the supernatants collected. The pellet was extracted with 0.5 ml of 80% methanol and centrifuged to collect the supernatant. This step was repeated, all three supernatants were combined, and the methanol concentration of the extract adjusted to 70%. The extracts were applied to pre-wetted Sep-pak C18 columns and eluted with 5 ml of 70% methanol. The eluate containing ABA was concentrated to near dryness at 37◦C under vacuum and the volume adjusted to 300 μl with deionized water. The samples were analyzed by competitive immuno assay with an ABA immuno assay kit according to the manufacturer’s directions. Results are expressed as nanomoles of -ABA per gram dry weight of tissue. To determine the effect of the nahG transgene on ABA levels, roots and shoots from WT and NahG plants were processed using the same procedure as above.To determine if plant activators induce resistance to Pst under different stress regimes in our experimental format, roots of hydroponically grown seedlings of cv. “New Yorker” were treated with TDL and then either not salt-stressed or exposed to 0.2 M NaCl for 18 h prior to inoculation.

In preliminary experiments, several concentrations of TDL were evaluated for phytotoxicity and for efficacy against bacterial speck disease with 10 ppm TDL selected as this concentration provided an optimal response. Concentrations higher than 10 ppm of TDL caused a slight bronzing of the roots and depressed growth of the seedlings, suggesting a mild phytotoxicity of the chemical in our experimental format at these higher levels. Inoculated salt-stressed seedlings had more severe disease symptoms and a significantly higher titer of pathogen than non-stressed, inoculated plants. Pretreatment with TDL at 10 ppm significantly reduced Pst colonization and symptom severity in “New Yorker” plants in both non-stressed and salt-treated seedlings . However, TDL did not prevent the proportional increase in Pst colonization observed in salt-stressed plants relative to the non-stressed controls.Since TDL harnesses SA-mediated defenses, we treated SA deficient NahG plants to see if TDL induces resistance under the different stress regimes in this highly susceptible background. As expected, NahG plants were more susceptible to Pst and accumulated significantly less SA following Pst infection than the WT background “New Yorker.” However, TDL provided strong protection in the NahG plants and mitigated the predisposing effect of salt-stress on bacterial speck disease.In a previous study we showed that ABA-deficient tomato mutants displayed a much reduced predisposition phenotype to salt stress . To determine if the protective effect of TDL is altered within an ABA-deficient tomato mutant,dutch bucket for tomatoes seedlings of WT and an ABA-deficient mutant within this background, sitiens, were treated in the same format and stress regimes as above. TDL significantly reduced Pst symptoms and colonization in both non-stressed and salt-treated plants of “Rheinlands Ruhm.” However, 3.6- and 5.4-fold increases in pathogen titer as a result of salt-stress were observed in both the control and TDL-treated plants, respectively, indicating that TDL did not prevent the proportional increase in Pst colonization in salt-stressed plants, similar to the results with “New Yorker” and NahG plants. In contrast, the sitiens mutant was not predisposed to Pst by salt stress and had significantly reduced symptoms and colonization by the pathogen than the background “Rheinlands Ruhm” . Nonetheless, TDL pretreatment of sitiens provided further protection against Pst .To determine if plant activators protect tomato roots and crowns against the oomycete pathogen, Phytophthora capsici, and predisposing root stress, tomato seedlings were treated with TDL or BTH , not stressed or salt-stressed as above, and then inoculated. There was no protection provided by the plant activators against disease caused by Phytophthora capsici in either the control or salt-treated plants, as reflected in symptom severity and pathogen colonization .Because elevated levels of ABA in tomato can enhance susceptibility to Pst and Phytophthora capsici, the effect of SA, TDL, and BTH on ABA levels was determined in roots and shoots. ABA concentrations in either shoots or roots at the time selected for inoculation in our treatment sequence were not altered by SA . However, a trend of increasing ABA accumulation was observed in TDL- and BTH treated “New Yorker” plants relative to the corresponding control plants . Although the increase in ABA accumulation in the plants treated with these plant activators is not statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05, it can be said that SA, TDL, and BTH do not reduce ABA content relative to untreated plants . In addition, salt stress did not further increase the levels of ABA in plants that had been pretreated with TDL or BTH, which were similar to the salt stressed controls.In a previous study, we demonstrated the predisposing effect of salt stress and a role for ABA as a determinative factor in predisposition in the tomato–Phytophthora capsici interaction .

The present study is the first report of salt-induced predisposition to the bacterial speck pathogen, Pst, in tomato. Furthermore, the results with the ABA-deficient sitiens mutant are consistent with the salt-induced susceptibility to Pst being mediated by ABA . These results conform to studies in Arabidopsis where ABA has been reported to promote susceptibility to Pst .Because SA has been shown to protect tomato against salt stress, possibly by an ABA-dependent mechanism , plant activators that operate via the SA pathway were evaluated for effect on salt-induced predisposition. Protection of tomato against bacterial speck disease by BTH is well documented , and TDL has previously been shown to reduce the severity of bacterial and fungal infections without inducing SA accumulation . Here, TDL was shown to protect against Pst in both non-stressed and salt-stressed tomato plants. TDL pretreatment strongly reduced disease and colonization by Pst in both “New Yorker” and SA-deficient NahG plants. TDL, or more likely its biologically active metabolite, SV-03, presumably allows the NahG plants to mount an SAR response to Pst infection in the absence of SA accumulation . TDL provided protection in both non-stressed and salt-stressed plants, but did not reverse the predisposing effect of salt stress. An increase in Pst colonization was observed in the salt-stressed, TDL-pretreated plants of both genotypes, with comparable percentage increases relative to the corresponding non-stressed controls in “New Yorker” and NahG plants. This indicates that TDL does not reverse the salt-stress effect on disease, per se, and likely targets stress network signaling independently of an ABA-mediated process that conditions the salt-induced susceptibility observed in this system . “Rheinlands Ruhm” also displayed salt-induced predisposition to Pst. Pretreatment with TDL significantly reduced Pst colonization in both “Rheinlands Ruhm” and sitiens . Similarly, TDL provided protection in both non-stressed and saltstressed plants, but did not reverse the predisposing effect of salt stress in “Rheinlands Ruhm” plants. The salt-induced increment in colonization by the pathogen was comparable in both the untreated and TDL-treated plants . The ABA-deficient mutant, sitiens, is considerably less susceptible to Pst than its background “Rheinlands Ruhm,” and does not exhibit salt-induced predisposition .Protection by plant activators against foliar pathogens is well established . However, relatively few studies have examined these compounds against soilborne pathogens and so TDL and BTH were evaluated for protection against root infection by Phytophthora capsici. Neither TDL nor BTH induced resistance or impacted salt-induced predisposition to Phytophthora capsici . Phytophthora capsici is an aggressive root and crown pathogen with a hemibiotrophic parasitic habit that triggers both SA- and jasmonic acid-mediated responses during infection of tomato .

Soil water extracts were prepared according to a published method with some modifications

The whole-plant N2 fixation potential was calculated by multiplying the total dry nodule biomass of each plant and the N2 fixation potential, which had been normalized to dry nodule biomass. To understand how plant effects were related to CNM concentration-dependent agglomeration in moist soils, the short- and long-term stabilities of CNMs were studied in soil water extracts. Briefly, control soil was weighed into separate 50 mL centrifuge tubes with 1:5 w/v Nanopure water . The centrifuge tubes were sealed securely and shaken horizontally on a shaker for 3 h . The extract was centrifuged to separate large solids, and the supernatant was decanted. The supernatant was vacuum filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane filter , and the filtrate was collected as the final soil extract and stored prior to use. A CNM stock solution was prepared by weighing dry CNM powder into the filtered soil extract, then mixing by brief sonication using a Branson 1510 bath sonicator . Aliquots of the dispersed CNM stock solution were further diluted by the filtered soil extract to yield a final lower concentration of 10 mg L−1. These two CNM concentrations were chosen for comparing the effect of lower versus higher CNM concentrations on CNM agglomeration in moist soil; both concentrations are relevant to the CNM doses used in the plant exposure experiment . The CNM suspensions were bathsonicated immediately before use in static agglomeration and sedimentation studies, hydroponic nft channel which were performed over a long time period . The changes of CNM hydrodynamic diameter and derived count rate with time were measured using dynamic light scattering in a Zetasizer NanoZS90 . DLS measurements were made every 15 s for the first 12 h, then daily from 1 to 7 d, and finally weekly until 56 d.

Meanwhile, dynamic CNM sedimentation in the soil extract was monitored by measuring the suspension absorbance at 600 nm using a UV-1800 spectrophotometer . Sedimentation patterns were inferred from the time course of normalized suspension absorbance at 600 nm . The UV-1800 spectrophotometer was zeroed using Nanopure water. The absorbance of the filtered soil extract alone was monitored over time as well, to confirm there was no interfering absorbance from the soil extract in the CNM suspensions. The zeta potential and electrophoretic mobility of the filtered soil extract and of 10 mg L−1 CNMs were also obtained using the Zetasizer NanoZS90. For either DLS, absorbance, ζ potential, or EPM, at least three replicate measurements were performed. Environmental scanning electron microscopy was performed to visualize the agglomerate morphologies of 10 and 300 mg L−1 CNMs in the soil extract, against a clean quartz sand substrate. Specimens were prepared by dispensing approximately 100 μL of the CNM suspensions onto clean quartz sand overlaying a 10 mm stainless steel conical-well Peltier stub. Imaging was by an FEI Co. XL30 field emission gun microscope , operated at 15 kV accelerating voltage, in a 3.5-torr chamber pressure with a gaseous secondary electron detector in environmental mode. Data are shown as the mean ± SE . For each CNM type, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s or Games-Howell post hoc multiple comparisons was used to determine significant differences between treatments . Homogeneity of variance was tested with Levene’s test. To explore dose–response relationships, correlations were performed between plant growth and end point metrics with soil CNM concentrations, using both two-tailed linear and power regression models. Correlation analyses were conducted both with and without the control data. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2013, IBM SPSS Statistics 23, and SigmaPlot 12.3.P. vulgaris is characterized by a particular evolutionary history.

Recent analyses based on sequence data presented clear evidence of the Mesoamerican origin of common bean, which was most likely located in México . The expansion of this species to South America resulted in the development of two ecogeographic distinct genetic pools with partial reproductive isolation . After the formation of these genetic pools -between 500,000 and 100,000 years ago – domestication took place, independently in the Mesoamerican and the southern Andean regions of the American continent . Genome analysis of BAT93 and G19833 , P. vulgaris sequenced model genotypes, has initially revealed interesting differences, for example between their genome size and number of annotated genes . The common bean is the most important legume for human consumption. In less favored countries from Latin America and Africa, common bean are staple crops serving as the primary source of protein in the diet. Soil acidity in these tropical regions is a major constraint for crop productivity, usually resulting in a combination of nutrient deficiency and metal toxicity . In acidic soils, aluminum toxicity is the primary factor of growth restriction, resulting in the inhibition of root growth and function, as well as in the increased risk of plants to perish of drought and mineral deficiencies, thus decreasing crop production . High Al levels mainly affect roots causing an arrest of the growth of the principal and lateral roots . In Arabidopsis, the regulation of root growth is modulated by an ABC transporter‐like protein, annotated as ALUMINUM SENSITIVE PROTEIN 3 , which is localized in the tonoplast, suggesting a role in Al vacuolar sequestration . The LOW PHOSPHATE ROOT 1 ferroxidase, an ALS3– downstream protein of the phosphate-deficiency signaling pathway, is involved in root growth inhibition, by modulating iron homeostasis and ROS accumulation in root apical meristem and elongation zone . In root cells, AlT can affect multiple areas, as the plasma membrane, the cell wall and symplastic components .

Common bean is known to be highly sensitive to AlT but this sensitivity is genotype-dependent . In 2010, the evaluation of the root morphological traits related to AlT of 36 P. vulgaris genotypes revealed that Andean genotypes were more resistant to Al than Mesoamerican ones . Mendoza-Soto et al. reported that Mesoamerican common-bean plants subjected to high Al levels for short periods showed decreased root length as well as characteristic symptoms of AlT, such as ROS accumulation, callose deposition, lipoperoxidation and cell death in roots. Along other regulators, plant response to metal toxicity involves also microRNAs as part of the regulatory mechanisms. These molecules are a class of non-coding small RNAs of about 21 nucleotides in length, regulating gene expression at post-transcriptional level, guided by sequence complementarity, inducing cleavage or translational inhibition of the corresponding target transcript . The relevance of miRNA regulation in heavy metal tolerance is well documented; it has been demonstrated that heavy metal-responsive miRNAs show differential expression according to the toxicity level. Target genes of these miRNAs generally encode transcription factors that transcriptionally regulate networks relevant for the response to heavy metals. Additionally these encode transcripts for proteins that participate in metal absorption and transport, protein folding, antioxidant system, phytohormone signaling, or miRNA biogenesis and feedback regulation . High-throughput small RNA sequencing analyses have identified miRNAs that respond to AlT in roots of different plants species, however their function in response to AlT is largely unknown. Some of the target genes cleaved by AlT-responsive miRNAs encode disease resistance proteins, transcription factors or auxin signaling proteins . Our previous research indicated that P. vulgaris is no exception to this phenomenon. We identified common-bean miRNAs that respond to Al, these include conserved miRNAs that are Al-responsive in other plant species -i.e. miR319, miR390, miR393- and also miR1511 . miRNAs from the miR1511 family have been identified in non-legume plants like strawberry and poplar tree ,nft growing system although in the latter its nature as a miRNA has been discussed as it has been considered as part of a retrotransposon . Regarding legumes, miR1511 has been identified in Medicago truncatula and soybean . Also, miR1511 was identified in Mesoamerican common-bean cultivars, being more abundant in flowers and roots . However, this miRNA was not identified when analyzing the Andean G19833 reference genome . Genetic variation in MIR1511 has been reported in a comparative genotyping analysis of different Asian accession of domesticated soybean as well as its wild type progenitor Glycine soja. While sequences of mature miR1511 and miR1511* were found in G. max accessions, the sequences of annual wild G. soja showed insertion/deletion in the stem-loop region of MIR1511 that included complete or partial deletions of mature miR1511 sequence . Updated research indicates that the miR1511 target gene is not conserved in the different plants where it has been identified. In strawberry, the miR1511 targets an LTR retrotransposon gene .

Inconsistencies about the nature of miR1511 target gene also hold for legume species. For instance, different targets have been proposed for soybean ranging from genes coding for proteins involved in the regulation of nitrogen metabolism to proteins relevant in plant cell development . While in other species such as M. truncatula target genes have been searched but have not been identified. The SP1L1 transcript has been proposed as the common-bean miR1511 target , however despite several efforts from our and other groups this prediction could not be experimentally validated. These results suggested a species-specific selection of the corresponding target thus it was essential to experimentally validate the nature and possible function of the miR1511 target gene in common bean. Recent analyses led us to predict an ABC-2-type transporter-related gene, annotated as Aluminum Sensitive Protein 3 , as the target for miR1511. In this work we present its experimental validation. In addition, we genotyped MIR1511 in ecogeographically different common-bean cultivars and investigated the role of miR1511 and its corresponding target in the regulation of plant response to AlT. The comparison of MIR1511 sequence from BAT93 vs. G19833 P. vulgaris reference sequences showed a 58-bp deletion in the G19833 genotype. Such deletion comprised around 57% of pre-miR1511 sequence and included 7-bp and 10-bp of mature and star miR1511, respectively . To explore this phenomenon at a larger scale within the Phaseolus genus, we analyzed Genotyping-By-Sequencing data from 87 genotypes originated from a single genetic population , called non-admixed genotypes. These included genotypes from three Phaseolus species and different populations of wild P. vulgaris: three populations from the Mesoamerican , one from the Andean , and one from the Northern Peru–Ecuador gene pools . All the genotypes belonging to the Andean gene pool and part of the Mesoamerican genotypes displayed a truncated MIR1511, in contrast to the Northern Peru– Ecuador genotypes and the other Phaseolus species that presented a complete version of the MIR1511 in their genome. A population clustering of P. vulgaris genotypes confirmed these results and showed that in the three Mesoamerican populations only a part of the MW1 cluster presented the MIR1511 deletion . Predicted target genes for P. vulgaris miR1511 include SP1L1-like  and isopentyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase , previously reported , and a protein with unknown function and the Aluminum Sensitive Protein 3 , from our recent bio-informatic analysis. From these predicted targets, ALS3 is the only one possibly related to AlT, as reported for Arabidopsis , and showing an adequate binding-site penalty score , thus the 5’RLM-RACE assay was used to experimentally validate the ALS3 mRNA cleavage site. As shown in Figure 3a, a significant number independently cloned transcripts mapped to the predicted site of cleavage, between the nucleotides at positions 457 and 458 of the transcript, which corresponds to position 9 and 10 of the predicted miR1511 binding site, thus confirming a miR1511-induced degradation. The other two degradation events mapped to 7 nucleotides upstream and 17 nucleotides downstream of the miRNA-associated degradation site, suggesting random degradation. An additional action of miR1511 to induce translation inhibition of ALS3 mRNA in common bean, cannot be excluded. miR1511 target genes differ among plant species . In order to evaluate the specificity of the miR1511/ALS3 regulatory node in common bean, we analyzed the miR1511/ALS3 binding site sequence alignment from eight model plant species, including five legumes, which contain a precursor gene of miR1511 in their genome . Because of the deletion in MIR1511 from the G19833 genotype, we used the mature miR1511 and the corresponding ALS3 binding site sequences from the BAT93 Mesoamerican genotype, as representative of P. vulgaris. Among plant species analyzed, P. vulgaris was the only one that showed a binding-site penalty score lower than 5, corresponding to a score recommended to consider a small RNA-target binding as probably functional. For other species, the high penalty scores, ranging from 7.5 to 9, indicate a very low probability for the existence of a functional miR1511/ALS3 regulatory node .

GDP-L-galactose is synthesized from GDP-mannose in the cytosol by GDP-mannose epimerase

In the dwarf Arabidopsis mutant murus 1 L-galactose replaces L-fucose in several cell wall polysaccharides, including RGII, because the plant is unable to produce GDP-fucose in its shoots as it lacks GDP-D-mannose-4,6-dehydratase GMD1 . This has been shown to result in the incomplete formation of the A side-chain of RG-II, which in turn reduces the stability of the borate cross-linked dimer . Thus, the structural integrity of RG-II is probably important for its biological functions. Pectic and hemicellulosic polysaccharides are synthesized in the Golgi apparatus using activated donor substrates, typically in the form of nucleotide diphosphate-linked sugars . However, most NDPsugars are synthesized in the cytosol . Thus, NDP-sugar transporters are required to provide substrates for glycan synthesis . The Golgi-localized NST sub-family, which forms part of clade IIIa of the NST/triose phosphate transporter super family , comprises four members related to GONST1 , the first nucleotide sugar transporter described in Arabidopsis . The members of this family are the only Arabidopsis NSTs that contain a predicted GDP-binding motif . Arabidopsis is known to synthesize four GDP-linked sugars: GDP-L-fucose, GDP-L-galactose, GDP-D-glucose and GDP-D-mannose. GDP-mannose for the glycosylation of glycosylinositolphosphorylceramides is transported into the Golgi by GONST1 , whereas GDP-fucose is transported by GONST4, which has been renamed GDPfucose transporter1 . No Golgi-localized GDP-L-galactose transporters have been identified to date.Most GDP-L-galactose is then converted, via L-galactose, into L-ascorbate ,macetas 5 litros which is important for maintaining redox balance in the cell, particularly under abiotic or biotic stress .

However, some GDP-Lgalactose is required for cell wall polysaccharide synthesis since L-galactose is present in side chain A of RG-II, in the side-chains of xyloglucan from a limited number of plant species  and in corn bran glucuronoarabinoxylan . Here we provide evidence that GONST3 probably encodes a Golgi-localized GDP-L-galactose transporter, which we rename Golgi GDP-L-galactose transporter1 . We used RNA interference to suppress GGLT1 expression in Arabidopsis, since complete loss of GGLT1 is lethal. Plants with decreased GGLT1 expression have growth defects, which are rescued by increasing the amount of borate in their growth medium. Chemical analysis of the cell walls of GGLT1 knock-down plants revealed a substantial reduction in the L-galactose decoration of RG-II, which is correlated with a decrease in the proportion of RG-II dimer in the wall and a decrease in the stability of the crosslink. Our results underscore the importance of RG-II to plant survival, and highlight an unexpectedly critical role for L-galactose in borate crosslinking of this unusual pectic polysaccharide.Publicly available gene expression data reveal that GGLT1 is a ubiquitously expressed gene, with a level of expression that is slightly lower than GONST1 and GFT1 . In an earlier study, the subcellular localization of GGLT1 was not determined because tagged GGLT1 could not be expressed in vivo . To overcome this issue, the full-length GGLT1 coding sequence tagged with a fluorescent protein was introduced into onion epidermal cells by biolistic transformation. Confocal imaging revealed that the fluorescently tagged GGLT1 gave a punctate signal that co-localized with a Golgi marker .No Arabidopsis lines carrying a T-DNA insertion in the GGLT1 open reading frame have been reported. A single T-DNA line , with an insertion 841 bp upstream of the start of transcription was obtained, but we were unable to identify any plants homozygous for the TDNA insertion despite screening at least 30 different seedlings. Therefore, we took a targeted gene-knockdown approach and generated RNAi transgenic lines with a hairpin RNA construct, which specifically targeted GGLT1. Forty independent hpGGLT1 transformants were screened, and four were selected for characterization . These lines all had rosettes which were smaller than the empty vector control .

Quantitative real-time PCR showed that in the rosette leaves of the hpRNAi lines 1–3 the levels of GGLT1 silencing were similar . These data, together with the lack of T-DNA lines, suggest that stronger suppression of GGLT1 or null mutants will produce plants that are not viable. The expression of GFT1, the closest homolog of GGLT1, was not affected in lines 3 and 4 but was decreased by up to 50% in lines 1 and 2 . The monosaccharide compositions of the walls, including fucose, were not significantly altered in any of the hpRNAi lines , indicating that their phenotypes do not result from altered fucosylation of cell wall glycans and are thus a consequence of GGLT1 silencing. Moreover, the shortened petiole phenotype that is characteristic of silenced GFT1 plants as well as mur1 plants, which also have cell walls with reduced fucose , was not observed in our hpGGLT1 knock-down lines .L-Galactose replaces L-fucose in the xyloglucan formed by mur1 and GFT1-silenced plants where GDP-fucose synthesis or transport is perturbed . Since GGLT1 and GFT1 are closely related NSTs, we first determined if xyloglucan fucosylation is altered in hpGGLT1 . No differences were discernible in the matrix-assisted laser desorption–ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of the oligosaccharides generated by enzymatic fragmentation of the xyloglucan from hpGGLT1 and EV control lines . The presence of fucosylated side chains, together with no substantial increase in the abundance of galactosylated side-chains in the hpGGLT1 lines, supports our assertion that GDP-fucose transport is unaffected in the silenced plants. GGLT1 is in the same NST subclade as GONST1, which provides GDP-mannose specifically for GIPC glycosylation, as opposed to polysaccharide biosynthesis . Although glycosylation of GIPCs is still poorly understood, it is possible that other GDP-sugars, inaddition to GDP-mannose are required. Therefore, we used thin layer chromatography and LC-MS to determine the GIPC glycan composition of hpGGLT1. No major differences were discernible between hpGGLT1 and EV GIPCs. The overall sphingolipidomic composition was also unchanged . Together, the combined results of these studies show that GGLT1 does not encode a Golgi-localized protein involved in the transport of GDP-L-fucose or GDP-D-mannose. Thus, we next investigated if the L-galactose content of the wall was altered in the GGLT1 suppressed lines.

No significant differences were detected in the wall monosaccharide compositions of leaves from soil-grown EV and hpGGLT1 lines . This is not surprising since in primary cell walls D-galactose is far more abundant than L-galactose . Moreover, D-galactose and L-galactose are not separated when the monosaccharide composition of the cell wall is determined by high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection . Rhamnogalacturonan-II is the only known L-galactosecontaining polysaccharide present in wild-type Arabidopsis cell walls, so we next determined whether the structure of RG-II differed in hpGGLT1 and EV plants. Material enriched in pectic polysaccharides, including RG-II, was obtained by extracting hpGGLT1 and EV leaf alcohol-insoluble residue with ammonium oxalate, a calcium chelator. This material was then treated with endopolygalacturonase and the products separated by size-exclusion chromatography . This separates RG-II from RG-I and oligogalacturonides, and also separates the RG-II monomer and dimer. In EV control plants the dimer accounts for 77% of the total RG-II isolated from the wall. Somewhat unexpectedly, the dimer accounts for only 49% of the hpGGLT1 RG-II,macetas de 30 litros and makes up only 6% of the RG-II in mur1-1 . This led us to suspect that the ability of hpGGLT1 RG-II to form dimers or the stability of those dimers had been altered. The latter notion is supported by our SEC data for the RG-II released by EPG treatment of the AIR . Under these conditions, in the absence of a chelating agent, the dimer accounted for 97% of the RG-II in the EV control plants , 87% of the RG-II in the hpGGLT1 lines and 70% of the mur1-1 . These results, together with data showing that calcium chelators partially convert the RG-II dimer to the monomer , strongly suggest that both the extent of formation and the stability of the borate cross-link in RG-II are affected in the hpGGLT1 lines. The differences in dimer abundance in the EPG and oxalate fractions were most pronounced with mur1-1 plants. This mutant produces RG-II that lacks L-galactose because its A side-chain is truncated , which led us to suspect that the L-galactose content of side-chain A of the RG-II from the hpGGLT1 lines may also be reduced. To determine if RG-II structure is indeed altered in the hpGGLT1 lines we isolated the total RG-II from the silenced and EV plants. Glycosyl residue composition analyses showed that D/L-galactose was reduced by about 35% in the most strongly affected hpGGLT1 lines . We then treated the RG-II with warm trifluoroacetic acid  to release side chains A and B. The MALDI-TOF MS analysis showed that a substantial portion of side-chain A from hpGGLT1 RG-II existed as a heptasaccharide whereas virtually all the A chain from the EV control was present as an octasaccharide . The A side-chains produced by hpGGLT1 and EV plants differ in mass by 162 Da, corresponding to a hexose residue, which we consider likely to be L-galactose. The side-chain B of RG-II contains a D-galactose residue . However, no differences were discernible in the structures of this side-chain from RG-II of hpGGLT1 and EV plants . Our structural data provide compelling evidence that the abundance of terminal L-galactose present on the A side-chain of RG-II is specifically affected in hpGGLT1 plants. To confirm the identity of the missing hexose in sidechain A, the RG-II monomers generated from the hpGGLT1 and EV plants were treated with a recently identified a-Lgalactosidase 95 from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron that specifically removes the terminal L-galactose from side-chain A of RGII .

Galactose was the only monosaccharide detected by HPAEC-PAD following hydrolysis of EV control RG-II with the a-L-galactosidase . Less galactose was released from the RG-II of the hpGGLT1- silenced lines relative to the control . The MALDI-TOF MS analysis of side-chain A, released by mild TFA hydrolysis following a-L-galactosidase treatment of RG-II monomer, revealed that the predominant oligosaccharides in the EV control plants correspond to side-chain A lacking L-galactose . The L-galactose was almost completely removed as only low-intensity signals corresponding to L-galactosylated A side-chains were discernible . The mass spectra of side-chain A from both hpGGLT1 silenced lines are similar to that of the EV control , demonstrating that the mass difference of 162 Da between the EV control and hpGGLT1 lines in Figure 3 is due to the specific loss of L-galactose. It has been proposed that pectin domains may be linked covalently to each other or to other cell wall components . To investigate whether the altered RG-II structure in the hpGGLT1 silenced lines had affected other pectic domains, the oxalate cell wall fraction was used to perform immune dotblots with a panel of antibodies raided against different pectin epitopes . However, no difference was observed between the EV control and the silenced lines. In combination with the monosaccharide composition data and the xyloglucan data we conclude that the reduction in GGLT1 expression does not affect non-RG-II polymers. These data provide strong evidence that silencing of GGLT1 leads to a reduction in the abundance of L-galactose on side-chain A of RG-II, and provides additional evidence that the absence of this sugar leads to a decrease in the ability of the RG-II monomer to self-assemble into a borate cross-linked dimer. Moreover, this L-galactosedepleted dimer is less stable in the presence of calcium chelators than its wild-type counterpart, a result consistent with the notion that interactions of borate and calcium with RG-II are important for plant growth .Several growth phenotypes, including the dwarf phenotype of mur1, that have been attributed to defects in RG-II structure and cross-linking have been reported to be rescued by supplementing the growth medium with additional borate . To further explore the observed growth phenotypes of the hpGGLT1 lines , plants were grown hydroponically to control the availability of all macro- and micro-nutrients, including borate. In low-borate media the hpGGLT1 lines are severely stressed, and their rosette diameter is about 70% smaller than that of EV control plants . However, this phenotype is not observed when the silenced plants are grown in high-borate media . The amount of borate in the growth medium did not affect GGLT1 expression, thereby excluding a potential effect of borate deficiency or supplementation on transgene expression and silencing strength . Therefore, we conclude that partial loss of the RG-II L-galactose decoration in hpGGLT1 reduces the rate of RG-II borate-dependent dimerization, directly affecting plant development.

How Does A Nft Hydroponic System Work

Methyl paraben is a preservative that is widely used in various cosmetic products, is amongst the most frequently detected parabens in TWW and bio solids, and is a known endocrine disruptor . Several studies have examined the fate and toxicity of these compounds in aquatic organisms . The observed adverse effects on aquatic organisms have raised concerns about the unintended consequences from widespread consumption and, ultimate release of the CECs into the aquatic environment . With the increasing use of TWW and bio solids for agriculture, it is crucial to also understand the effects of these compounds on terrestrial organisms. In this study, we carried out laboratory experiments to assess the potential uptake, biotransformation, and biochemical effects of CECs in earthworms. Eisenia fetida was exposed to the four CECs in an artificial soil, and kinetics of the parent compound, uptake and metabolite formation were evaluated. Changes in enzymes associated with oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation were assessed as biochemical markers of potential toxicity.Preliminary experiments were carried out to assess any potential mortality from the test compounds on E. fetida . The uptake and bioaccumulation of the test compounds followed OECD guideline on “Bioaccumulation in Terrestrial Oligochaetes.” Tests were performed in glass jars painted black and then white to reduce light and heat absorption. Jars contained 150 g ± 0.5 of artificial soil with 3 worms in each container. The worms were allowed to acclimate to the test conditions for 24 h before exposure to the test compounds. The incubation was carried out at room temperature.

Prior to spiking, maceta 5 litros earthworms were removed from jars and soils were spiked with different volumes of the standard stock solutions to arrive at initial concentrations of 70, 50, 275, and 200 ng g-1 for sulfamethoxazole, diazepam, naproxen and methyl paraben, respectively. Soils were moistened with deionized water, homogenized by stirring, and the earthworms were then reintroduced. Concentrations were selected based on environmental concentrations previously reported in the literature . Moisture content of 50% was selected based on preliminary experiments and maintained during the incubation. Jars containing the spiked soil without E. fetida and non-spiked soil with E. fetida were prepared and maintained simultaneously. At the start of the incubation, individual mature worms were maintained in separate jars to assess treatment-induced weight changes, if any. Samples were taken at 0 h, 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d of incubation. At each sampling time point, four treatment and four control jars were harvested for a total of twelve worms per time point per treatment. Worms were collected, rinsed with deionized water and placed in Petri dishes with a moistened paper towels for 24 h to purge their gut content. They were then weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until extraction. The earthworms were homogenized with 8 mL acetonitrile:H2O for 5 min using a Kinematica™ Polytron PT 10/35 GT Benchtop Homogenizer . The CECs were extracted from the homogenized using 10 min of sonication, followed by 15 min of centrifugation at 15000 g. The supernatants were collected, dried under nitrogen, and reconstituted using 1.5 mL methanol:H2O . The reconstituted extracts were placed in LC-vials for analysis. Porewater was collected using 20 g of soil by centrifugation at 15000 g for 20 min, after which 2 mL of water was withdrawn and further centrifuged at 12000 g for 15 min. The resulting supernatant was used for instrument analysis. The soil was extracted by vortexing 10 g of soil with 10 mL acetonitrile:H2O for 5 min, followed by sonication for 20 min. Samples were centrifuged at 15000 g for 20 min, and the supernatant was collected, dried under nitrogen and reconstituted in 1.5 mL methanol:H2O . All extracts were filtered using 0.2 µm PTFE syringe filters before instrument analysis.

Extraction efficiencies were assessed using deuterated standards and are given in the Supplementary Information . Earthworm tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and then homogenized with 2 mL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer  with 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid using a Kinematica™ Polytron PT 10/35 GT Benchtop Homogenizer . The homogenate was then centrifuged at 12 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C . The resulting supernatant was used for enzyme activity assays as described below. The activities of glutathione-S-transferase , catalase and superoxide dismutase were determined as in Sun et al. . To determine GST activity, 100 µL of supernatant was combined with 2 mL of a reaction mixture containing 50 mM PBS , 5 mM glutathione , and 1 mM 1-Chloro-2,4,- dinitrobenzene dissolved in 96% ethanol. The GST activity was measured at 340 nm for 3 min and the concentration was calculated using the GSH-CDNB adduct synthesis . The CAT activity was determined by combining 200 µL of supernatant with 3 mL reaction mixture containing 10 mM H2O2 in 50 mM PBS buffer . The concentration was calculated by following the consumption of H2O2 at 240 nm for 3 min . The activity of SOD was determined by combining 100 µL supernatant with 3 mL reaction mixture containing 50 mM PBS buffer , 13 mM methionine, 75 µM nitro blue tetrazolium , 2 µM riboflavin, and 0.1 mM EDTA. The mixture was illuminated for 15 min at a light intensity of 5,000 lux for 15 min. One unit of SOD activity was defined as the concentration of enzyme required to cause 50% inhibition of NBT when monitored at 560 nm. The protein content was used to standardize enzyme activity and determined by combining 5 mL of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 reaction mixture and 100 µL of supernatant and use to standardize enzyme activity. Concentration was calculated from a six-point standard curve using bovine serum albumin monitored at 595 nm .All treatments in the E. fetida incubations experiments contained four replicates and mortality, if any, was assessed immediately upon stoppage. Standard calibration curves with r 2 values of at least 0.98, were made from standards of diazepam, naproxen, methyl paraben, sulfamethoxazole, nordiazepam, odesmethylnaproxen, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, N4-acetylsulfamethoxazole, diazepam-d5, naproxen-d3, sulfamethoxazole-d4, methyl paraben-d4 and used for quantification for all analytes. A limit of detection of 1 ng mL-1 and a limit of quantification of 5 ng mL-1 were determined for all analytes, except for p-hydroxybenzoic acid that had aLOD of 3 ng mL-1 and an LOQ of 5 ng mL-1 . LOD and LOQs were calculated from a signal to noise ratio of 3 and 10 respectively. Compound peaks were detected and integrated using TargetLynx XS software . Data were analyzed and graphed with StatPlus and Prism 8 GraphPad software . Results were calculated as the mean ± standard error , and a Student’s t-test or ANOVA with a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc was used to assess the systematic difference between groups . The concentrations of CECs were monitored in three phases, soil, soil pore water, and earthworm tissue, in both the presence and absence of earthworms throughout the 21 d incubation. To determine the potential effect of earthworms’ presence on the partitioning of the four CECs amongst the soil and soil pore water the distribution coefficient was calculated at each time point and the differences between earthworm treatment and the non-earthworm controls were compared . No significant differences in the Kd values were observed between the earthworm treatment and non-earthworm controls for any of the CECs,cultivo de la frambuesa indicating that earthworms did not significantly affect the association of these CECs to the solid phase of the artificial soil. For diazepam, the Kd values were calculated to range between 0.84 to 6.56 mL g -1 throughout the incubation. These Kd values were lower than those previously reported for diazepam in batch and field sorption measurements using agriculture soils  but were in agreement with the low Kd values observed for pharmaceuticals in sandy soils .

The low Kd values indicated that diazepam was not strongly adsorbed to the solid matrix of the artificial soil. The Kd for naproxen ranged between 0.87 to 11.0 mL g -1 throughout the incubation. The low Kd values were consistent with those previously reported for naproxen in sandy soils [0.49 mL g -1 ] The Kd values for sulfamethoxazole were similarly very low throughout the incubation, ranging from 0.71 to 1.75 mL g.-1 These values were consistent with those previously reported in the literature for grassland soils and arable land soils , indicative of its high mobility in the soil environment . The derived Kd values, for methyl paraben in the earthworm treatment and non-earthworm controls could be calculated only for the initial sampling point as it rapidly disappeared from the soil and soil porewater. This may be due to rapid biodegradation in the soil and/or rapid metabolism in E. fetida . To verify active uptake of CECs by earthworms, a range of controls were used, including soil blanks and non-earthworm controls. None of the parent CECs were detected in the earthworm or soil blanks. However, degradation of both methyl paraben and sulfamethoxazole was observed in the non-earthworm soil, indicating that microbial and/or abiotic degradation of these compounds occurred in the media . The parent compounds of diazepam, sulfamethoxazole, and naproxen were detected in earthworms throughout the 21 d incubation, with the concentration of both diazepam and naproxen increasing to 53.8 ± 24 ng g-1 and 110 ± 25 ng g-1 , peaking at 14 d. These results suggested that both diazepam and naproxen were being taken up and accumulated in E. fetida . Sulfamethoxazole, on the other hand, appeared to have a relatively stable concentration in the earthworm tissues throughout the incubation . However, this could be due to active metabolism of sulfamethoxazole in earthworm instead of limited uptake or accumulation. Methyl paraben was not quantifiable in earthworm tissues and was rapidly lost in the artificial soil. For each of the three quantifiable CECs in the earthworm tissues , the bioconcentration factor and bioaccumulation factor were calculated and compared for each time point. No significant differences in the BAF were observed for sulfamethoxazole or naproxen over the course of the incubation . However, the BAF for diazepam did significantly increase over time , indicating that the increased exposure time to soil pore water resulted an increased concentration of diazepam in the earthworm tissues, likely due to slower metabolism or time needed for reach equilibrium. The BCF for diazepam and naproxen did not significantly change throughout the incubation period . For sulfamethoxazole the a significant difference in BCF was observed between the 3 d and the 14 d sampling points, but no clear pattern in BCF values over time was discernable. A significant difference between BAF the BCF values were observed for sulfamethoxazole at 7 d . There was a trend towards a significantly higher BCF than BAF for diazepam throughout the incubation. The trend may be due to increased uptake of the compounds from the soil pore water by E. fetida, which was consistent with several previous studies that showed dermal absorption via water to be the primary route for uptake of contaminants by worms . However, due to a lack of quantifiable replicates in soil or soil pore water statistical significance could not be assessed. Further research is necessary to understand the exposure pathways for polar CECs for invertebrates such as in earthworms in soils. Intriguingly, it was also observed that all three quantifiable CECs displayed an similar pattern where there was an initial increase in BAF or BCF up to 3 or 7 d, followed by a decrease at 7 or 14 d, and followed by increases again till the end incubation . This pattern may be indicative of early uptake and metabolism, followed by an insufficient response from detoxification enzymes, resulting in storage and accumulation of the compounds in the earthworm tissues, as was previously observed in aquatic organisms . To the best of knowledge, this was the first time the BCF and BAF have been calculated in earthworms for naproxen, diazepam and sulfamethoxazole. While many studies have considered the bioconcentration/accumulation of different CECs in plants and earthworms , very few studies have considered the changes to these values over time.

¿Cuáles son las ventajas de elegir macetas plásticas en comparación con otros materiales?

Elegir macetas plásticas en comparación con otros materiales tiene varias ventajas. Aquí hay algunas razones por las cuales algunas personas prefieren macetas de plástico:

  1. Ligereza: Las macetas de plástico son más ligeras que las macetas de cerámica o terracota, lo que facilita su manejo y movimiento. Esto es especialmente útil si necesitas trasladar las plantas con frecuencia.
  2. Durabilidad: Las macetas de plástico son duraderas y resistentes a la intemperie. No se rompen fácilmente y pueden soportar condiciones climáticas adversas sin deteriorarse.
  3. Retención de humedad: Las macetas de plástico tienden a retener mejor la humedad que las macetas de terracota o cerámica. Esto puede ser beneficioso para algunas plantas, ya que ayuda a mantener un ambiente más constante para el sistema radicular.
  4. Variedad de formas y tamaños: Las macetas de plástico ofrecen una amplia variedad de formas, tamaños y colores. Esto brinda opciones estéticas y funcionales para adaptarse a diferentes necesidades y preferencias.
  5. Asequibilidad: En general,maceta 5 litros las macetas de plástico tienden a ser más asequibles que las macetas de materiales como cerámica o terracota. Esto las hace una opción económica para jardineros aficionados.
  6. Facilidad de limpieza: Las macetas de plástico son fáciles de limpiar y desinfectar, lo que ayuda a prevenir enfermedades de las plantas. También son menos propensas a acumular sales minerales.
  7. Aislamiento térmico: Las macetas de plástico proporcionan un mejor aislamiento térmico para las raíces de las plantas, lo que puede ser beneficioso en climas extremos.

A pesar de estas ventajas, es importante destacar que cada tipo de material de maceta tiene sus propias características y puede ser más adecuado para ciertos tipos de plantas o situaciones. Además, algunas personas prefieren materiales más naturales por razones estéticas o ambientales. La elección de la maceta dependerá de tus necesidades específicas y preferencias personales.

¿Dónde puedo comprar macetas plásticas al por mayor?

Para comprar macetas plásticas al por mayor, puedes considerar varias opciones. Aquí hay algunas sugerencias:

  1. Distribuidores de Jardinería y Artículos para el Hogar: Busca distribuidores especializados en productos de jardinería y artículos para el hogar. Muchos de ellos ofrecen macetas plásticas en grandes cantidades a precios mayoristas.
  2. Mayoristas en Línea: Explora plataformas en línea que se especializan en la venta al por mayor. Hay sitios web que conectan a compradores con proveedores de productos de jardinería,maceta 40 litros donde puedes encontrar macetas plásticas en grandes cantidades.
  3. Ferias Comerciales y Exposiciones: Participar en ferias comerciales o exposiciones relacionadas con la jardinería y la horticultura puede proporcionarte la oportunidad de conocer a proveedores y fabricantes de macetas plásticas al por mayor.
  4. Contacta a Fabricantes Directos: Algunos fabricantes de macetas plásticas pueden vender directamente al por mayor. Ponte en contacto con ellos para conocer sus opciones de compra a granel y sus términos.
  5. Tiendas de Suministros para Agricultura: Las tiendas especializadas en suministros para la agricultura y la jardinería suelen ofrecer productos al por mayor. Investiga tiendas locales o regionales que se centren en este tipo de suministros.
  6. Empresas de Suministros de Jardinería: Busca empresas especializadas en suministros de jardinería y paisajismo. Estas compañías a menudo tienen opciones de compra al por mayor para clientes comerciales.

Recuerda comparar precios, términos de envío y políticas de devolución antes de tomar una decisión. Además, verifica la reputación del proveedor para asegurarte de que sea confiable y ofrezca productos de calidad.

Seleccionar las Macetas de Plást

Cuando se trata de tener éxito en la jardinería, la elección de los recipientes es tan importante como la elección de las plantas. Las macetas de plástico, con su versatilidad y durabilidad, se han convertido en una opción popular tanto para la jardinería interior como la exterior. Sin embargo, seleccionar el tipo correcto de maceta de plástico es crucial para garantizar un crecimiento y salud óptimos de las plantas. En este artículo, exploraremos los diversos tipos de macetas de plástico y discutiremos cuáles son las más adecuadas para la jardinería interior y cuáles son ideales para uso en exteriores.

Jardinería Interior:

Macetas Livianas y Portátiles:

Para la jardinería interior, donde es posible que necesite mover las plantas para aprovechar la luz solar o reorganizar el diseño de su jardín interior,cultivo del arandano las macetas de plástico livianas y portátiles son una excelente elección. Busque macetas fabricadas con plásticos de alta calidad y livianos que sean fáciles de transportar y reorganizar. Atractivo Estético:

Muchos jardineros de interior priorizan el aspecto visual de sus contenedores de plantas. Las macetas de plástico decorativas con diversas formas, tamaños y colores pueden complementar la decoración de su interior. Opte por macetas que mejoren el atractivo estético general de su espacio interior. Macetas de Auto-Riego:

Las plantas de interior a menudo requieren un riego más preciso. Las macetas de plástico de auto-riego con depósitos incorporados pueden ayudar a mantener niveles de humedad consistentes, reduciendo el riesgo de riego excesivo o insuficiente. Esta característica es especialmente útil para personas ocupadas o aquellas nuevas en la jardinería. Jardinería Exterior:

Macetas Resistentes a los Rayos UV y Duraderas:

Las condiciones exteriores exponen las macetas de plástico a la luz solar intensa y a condiciones climáticas variables. Elija macetas fabricadas con plásticos resistentes a los rayos UV y duraderos para resistir la exposición prolongada al sol sin degradarse ni volverse quebradizas con el tiempo. Orificios de Drenaje:

Un drenaje adecuado es crucial para las plantas exteriores para evitar el encharcamiento, que puede provocar la pudrición de las raíces. Seleccione macetas de plástico con suficientes agujeros de drenaje para asegurar que el agua en exceso pueda escapar, fomentando sistemas radiculares saludables. Aislamiento para la Regulación de la Temperatura:

Las temperaturas exteriores pueden fluctuar significativamente. Las macetas de plástico aisladas ayudan a regular la temperatura del suelo, protegiendo las raíces de las plantas contra el calor extremo o el frío. Esto es especialmente importante para las plantas sensibles a las variaciones de temperatura. Recipientes Grandes para el Crecimiento de las Raíces:

Las plantas exteriores a menudo requieren más espacio para el desarrollo de las raíces. Elija macetas de plástico más grandes que proporcionen suficiente espacio para que las raíces se expandan,frambueso maceta fomentando un crecimiento saludable y la estabilidad, especialmente para plantas o arbustos más grandes. Consideraciones Generales:

Materiales Reciclables:

La sostenibilidad es una consideración clave. Busque macetas de plástico fabricadas con materiales reciclables, contribuyendo a los esfuerzos de conservación del medio ambiente. Facilidad de Limpieza y Mantenimiento:

Tanto las macetas de interior como las de exterior deben ser fáciles de limpiar y mantener. Superficies lisas y materiales resistentes a manchas y moho facilitan la jardinería sin complicaciones. Opciones Económicas:

Considere su presupuesto al elegir macetas de plástico. Hay opciones económicas disponibles sin comprometer la calidad. Busque macetas que ofrezcan un equilibrio entre asequibilidad y durabilidad. Conclusión:

En conclusión, las macetas de plástico adecuadas para sus esfuerzos de jardinería dependen de factores como la ubicación, el tipo de planta y las preferencias personales. Al seleccionar macetas adaptadas a sus necesidades específicas, puede crear jardines interiores y exteriores prósperos que no solo muestren la belleza de sus plantas, sino que también mejoren su experiencia general de jardinería.