Higher rates of N application have been associated with discolouration during storage in cabbage and potato. Berard demonstrated the influence of higher N application rates on the incidence and severity of black midrib in cold storage in the susceptible cultivar Safe keeper. Furthermore, electrolyte leakage in the leaf tissue was reduced at lower N application rate and electrolyte leakage and change in membrane structure increased at higher N application rates . But, according to the previous authors, these results were not consistent during the two years of investigation . However, in the current study, red and green lettuce varieties showed different trends in their browning response related to the chromaticity b* value with respect to the N application rates . The application of higher than recommended N rates in gravel film technique affected the fresh cut visual quality and coincides with the previous findings of Poulsen et al. and Bonasia et al. . In Multigreen 1, the higher N application rates for a shorter time showed lower browning . Therefore, it is evident from this study that the response to preharvest N application rates on browning depends on the variety. Wounding increases the PAL activity . Physiological attributes related to quality attributes and storage life of minimally processed lettuce coincided with increasing concentration of predominantly phenolic acids in different fresh cuts of lettuce cultivars. Increase in specific phenolic acid concentration differed according to the N application in different cultivars in this study . Furthermore, the decrease in phenolic acids and increasing PPO is likely to explain the browning or deep blush brown colour in red Multired 4 during storage with higher N application rates . The reduction in b* value related to the onset of browning in the fresh cuts of Mulitired 4 and Multigreen 3 were minimised by lower preharvest N application rates due to fairly higher concentrations of ascorbic acid . However, Luna et al. reported that the ascorbic acid concentrations are higher in red lettuce cultivars compared to the green cultivars.
The higher ascorbic acid concentrations in Multired 4 could probably have controlled the browning and maintained the higher b* value . Multired 4 showed improved shelf life and overall quality due to the higher concentration of phenolic compounds and lower PPO activity than the two green lettuce cultivars . Reducing trend in dicaffeoyltartaric acid concentration was reported during post harvest storage at 5°C and 85% RH . However, a divergence in observation with regards to the increase in dicaffeoyltartaric acid content in Multigreen 1 at similar storage conditions could deny its participation as a substrate for browning mechanism.Hence,hydroponic nft system the import of goods is necessary to meet the food demand of urban citizens, which has caused an increased dependency on the global food production and supply system. Such a reliance on external inputs represents a vulnerability when major political or economic disruptions occur, and it can often be the leading cause of such instabilities. The inequality in food distribution represents an additional risk, worsen by the increasing urban poverty. Adding on to the local challenges for food provisioning, the global food supply chain is also vulnerable to big-scale changes. In fact, climate change will put food security at risk on several levels, for example by reducing yields and land suitability, and by increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events. Satisfying the demand of fertilizers is another environmental challenge of food production, given that mineral fertilizers are a non-renewable resource that is being consumed at an increasing rate. In addition to being vulnerable to disruptions, the food system is also responsible of environmental degradation; considering the environmental impacts generated by the final consumptions of the European Union, the production and distribution of foodstuff accounts for 30% of the impacts on climate change, 33% of the impacts on ecotoxicity and 60% of the impacts on eutrophication. Urban agriculture has been proposed as a practice to respond to the challenges presented above, and produce positive environmental, economic and social effects, such as shortening the food supply chain, reducing the emissions of greenhouse gasses, microclimate improvement, improved water management, improved diet-related health, and stress reduction. Smit and Nasr pointed out that urban agriculture could promote the development of a circular economy by closing ecological loops using wastewater and organic solid waste as inputs. However, urban agriculture is not a homogeneous practice, and includes, among the others, small commercial farms, community-supported agriculture, community gardens, rooftop gardens or greenhouses, hydroponic and aquaponics farms and indoor agriculture. Mougeot proposed to categorize UA based on types of economic activity, products, location, area used, production system, production scale, and product destination. Given this variability, a case-by-case evaluation is needed to show if and in what conditions UA can deliver positive impacts and can replace conventional agriculture.
Urban agriculture has been studied from a life cycle perspective, reporting different results that show that UA is not a less impacting production system per se. For example, Kulak et al. calculated that up to 34 t CO2eq ha-1 a-1 could be avoided by substituting conventional agricultural products with vegetables from community gardens in the UK. On the other hand, for Goldstein et al. urban agriculture in northern climates performs worse than its conventional counterpart, mainly because of its high energy requirement and/or low yields. Sanyé-Mengual et al. evaluated a rooftop greenhouse production in Barcelona: their results show that the UA system had a lower impact on the environment, but that crop efficiency was determinant for the performance of the cultivation. This case study analyses, from an environmental perspective, a vertical hydroponic urban farm called “La Petite Ferme du Grand Lyon” and based in Lyon , using Life Cycle Assessment. The pilot farm is run by the private company ReFarmers and produces leafy greens and herbs that are sold directly to restaurants and citizens.This work’s goal is to evaluate the environmental performance of a high-yield vertical hydroponic farm, and to compare it to conventional agriculture. The analysis shows whether and to what extent this type of hydroponic is able to produce vegetables with a lower environmental impact than soil-based conventional agriculture. By showing if urban agriculture can compete with conventional vegetable production, this study highlights the strong and weak points of urban hydroponic production in temperate continental climates, and therefore supports the improvement and development of sustainable urban food supply systems. Urban agriculture is, in this case, a supplementary source of vegetables; therefore, the capacity of urban hydroponic agriculture to fulfil the entire food requirement of European cities is outside of the scope of this study. The modelling framework applied is attributional LCA. According to the ILCD Handbook we identified our case study as a Situation A “micro-level, product or process-related decision support study”. In fact, by having a small market share, the farm’s products can impact on the market solely to a limited extent, generating only small-scale consequences [22].We performed a cradle-to-gate analysis considering the cultivation phase and the transport of the products to the retailers. Figure 1 shows the boundaries of the system.The end-of-life of the capital goods was selected depending on the material: steel, aluminium and iron parts are recycled, as well as PVC and PE plastic components; the other plastic materials, which cannot be recycled due to their composition, are sent to incineration. We had to exclude the process of pest control through insect release; the insects are not bred in the farm, and no literature data could be found about the breeding process of parasitoids and the related inputs. The fixation of CO2 by the plants was omitted because the gas is expected to be released in the near future as a biogenic emission of carbon dioxide. Moreover, as we compare the same amount of produced lettuce, the uptake of carbon dioxide is the same for both types of cultivation. Since the fertilizers are not lost through the soil, but remain available to the plants thanks to the recirculation of the water, we assumed the fertilizers emissions to be zero.
For conventional agriculture, we considered two scenarios: the production and delivery of lettuce grown in heated greenhouses and the production and delivery of open field cultivated lettuce ; both the scenarios were derived from the Ecoinvent database. In all the three scenarios, the packaging of the vegetables has not been included. This choice is justified by the fact that the impact of packaging has been showed to be relatively low [24].The Life Cycle Inventory of scenario S1 consists of data provided by the farmers, covering four months of production in 2016. The annual production was extrapolated considering the seasonal variation of some inputs, such as the water demand. Moreover, we took into account that the production stopped for 1.5 months in winter due to low temperatures. The losses of production in the farm are indirectly accounted for, since the farmers reported the yields as production ready to be sold, i.e. the losses has been already subtracted. The farm covers an area of around 325 m2 , of which only 18% were used for the plant cultivation. The seedlings are not produced in the farm but bought from a local organic company; since no direct data were available, we refer to the seedling production process from Stössel et al.. We assumed no heating is required, since the plant variety are selected according to the season. A neighbour farm manages the transport to the retailers of the vegetables from the hydroponic farm, together with their production; a mass allocation was performed to distribute the impacts of this process, and a car trip of 20 km per week was estimated. No losses of products are assumed in this phase, due to the length and frequency of the trip.As an overview, the urban vertical hydroponic production shows the best performance in the categories of marine eutrophication and agricultural land occupation. For climate change, freshwater eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity and fossil depletion, the impact is higher than on-field conventional agriculture . Anyway, in all cases except for water depletion the performance of S1 is visibly better than the production of lettuce in heated greenhouses . These results are explained by taking into consideration the characteristics of the different systems. The vertical hydroponic farm requires more capital goods than the other types of cultivations, since it does not rely on soil substrate, but needs vertical plastic structures and a recirculating irrigation system, which requires electricity . For climate change, nft channel the consumption of electricity contributes for two thirds to the impact in scenario S1, while in scenario S3 the production and use of fertilizers are the main responsible of greenhouse gas emissions. Whereas these two scenarios differ for only 0.10 kg CO2eq, when lettuce is grown in heated greenhouses , it is responsible of the emission of 7.08 kg CO2eq per every kg of lettuce that reaches the supermarket.
By recirculating water and avoiding losses for infiltration, scenario S1 has a water consumption seven times lower than greenhouse conventional production, and around four times lower than on-field cultivation, that benefits from rain events . In Mediterranean climates, such as Greece, the water demand per kg of lettuce production reaches 83 litres, fourteen times higher than in vertical hydroponics. However, the irrigation system requires a constant water flow guaranteed by a pumping system, which consumes electricity. The impact of electricity depends on how this electricity is produced; given the location of the farm, we considered the French energy mix, of which more than 70% is nuclear energy. The production of nuclear energy has a high requirement of cooling-water, which explains why scenario S1 has a worse impact on water depletion, even if it has a smaller direct water consumption. Table 3. Results of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment of 1 kg of lettuce grown in the three scenarios: vertical hydroponic production , heated greenhouse production and on-field cultivation . The results are normalised with respect to the yields in Table 2. The consumption of electricity for irrigation is among the main contributing processes for all the impact categories, but is less impacting than the consumption of heat of the conventional greenhouse scenario. In facts, scenario S2 has the worst performance in every category.