Loss of firmness is a hallmark of fruit ripening and negatively correlates with shelf life

Fruit are rich in essential nutrients, yet most people do not consume the recommended amount of fresh produce to sustain healthy diets and reduce disease risks ERS — Food Availability and Consumption. To promote consumption, expand access, and reduce waste, fruit quality and shelf life need to be in- creased through breeding and biotechnology, alongside adequate harvest practices, transportation logistics, and post harvest treatments. Commercial fruit crops are primarily bred for high yield and extended shelf life to meet the expectations for mass production and global markets, however, recently, there has been a shift of focus toward developing new crop varieties that meet consumer demands for better flavor and nutrition. Balancing shelf life with consumer-based quality traits is perhaps the biggest challenge breeders and researchers face in the quest for better quality fruit, mainly because these attributes appear to have negative genetic correlations in many crops . Quality peaks when fruit reach their optimum ripeness. Many studies on fruit ripening of various plant species have emerged in the past decade, helping to identify genetic pathways and molecular regulators that can be manipulated for crop improvement . Moreover, biotechnology advances have provided access to high- quality genomic resources and tools, supporting breeding strategies, genetic modification, and gene editing in traditional and nontraditional fruit crops. Here, we review current knowledge of the genetics of fruit traits and argue that manipulating transcription factors is a promising approach to enhance fruit quality. We discuss how pleiotropic effects could potentially be avoided by targeting TFs that exclusively regulate specific pathways instead of master regulators. However, ripening master regulators may remain useful if their effects on gene expression can be fine-tuned . Similarly, plastic square flower bucket the timing and coordination of regulators need to be considered to achieve desired effects on fruit traits .

Finally, we consider the current climate surrounding consumer acceptance of genetically modified and gene-edited fruit.Fruit are used as food source for macronutrients and micronutrients . Macronutrients are essential to provide energy and maintain the body’s structure and functions. Vitamins are required for various bodily functions and can only be found in food sources such as fruit. Antioxidants inhibit cell damage caused by oxidative agents. Carotenoids , and phenolics , reviewed above, are all antioxidants, as well as vitamin C . Vitamin-D deficiency is a global health problem due to few dietary sources of this vitamin. Bio-fortification of vitamin D in tomatoes has recently become possible by engineering its biosynthesis from a pre-existing pathway . Owing to partial duplication of the pathway, a single enzyme could be knocked out with CRISPR–Cas9 to convert the precursor into vitamin D without an expense to other metabolites. This discovery has further implications for other Solanaceae plants. Ascorbic acid, an important antioxidant and nutrient for immune health and wound healing, has proven to be less easily bio-fortified into fruit because increasing biosynthesis also leads to activation of catabolic and recycling pathways . Post transcriptional regulation of an ascorbic acid biosynthesis enzyme from kiwifruit has been demonstrated using tobacco leaves . Removing the upstream open reading frame that repressed translation increased ascorbic acid concentration in the leaves. Function-specific TFs can increase ascorbic acid in fruit without negative impact on quality as demonstrated in tomato. SlHZ24, a bHLH TF, regulates ascorbic acid biosynthesis and catabolism genes, and its transient over expression has been reported to increase the accumulation of this vitamin . Other TFs, SlNL33 and SlNFYA10, have been found to regulate the pathway negatively, and silencing them also increased ascorbic acid level . Understanding regulatory pathways governing nutrients can also facilitate traditional breeding programs. For example, a genome-wide association study led to the discovery and validation that alleles in SlbHLH59 determine ascorbic acid content in tomato cultivars . A less specific effect on nutrient accumulation can be achieved with hormone applications. For example, ethylene application in kiwifruit, a climacteric fruit, increased ascorbic acid and other antioxidants during ripening . Ascorbic acid also increased after nitric oxide application in sweet pepper, a non-climacteric fruit .Fruit flavor is a critical quality trait for consumer acceptance. Flavor includes all sensations experienced when eating, consisting of taste, aroma, and texture . In fruit, taste is mainly defined by a balance between sweetness and acidity but can include bitterness and umami.

Fruit aroma comes from specific classes and combinations of volatile organic compounds . For example, the unique kiwifruit flavor is associated with esters, mainly ethyl butanoate and methyl butanoate . Modulation of function-specific transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators offers an effective solution for flavor improvement. A bHLH TF in banana activates 11 starch-degrading genes expressed during fruit ripening and is a likely candidate for increasing sugar and sweetness . In strawberry, editing the uORF of a bZIP TF that controls sucrose biosynthesis led to its translational activation and higher sugar content in fruit . Combining datasets generated through genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, and consumer panel studies has proven to be an effective strategy for identifying flavor-related genes and TFs. In tomato, metabolite data, associated loci, and consumer panels were analyzed across hundreds of varieties to determine key genes contributing to flavor . Coupling metabolites relevant to flavor with transcriptomic analyses can produce gene networks and identify regulatory TFs involved in flavor pathways. This approach was used in kiwifruit, where the AcNAC4 TF regulating a key gene in ester biosynthesis was validated . Homologs of these NAC TFs have been implicated in ester formation in peach and apple , suggesting that their functions are conserved across diverse families of climacteric fruit . Flavor is impacted by post harvest handling. Chilling during transportation and storage can alter fruit flavor. Epigenetic factors have been shown to regulate the suppression of VOC biosynthesis in chilled tomatoes . Most climacteric fruit are picked unripe and later treated with ethylene to induce ripening. However, this practice has been associated with poor flavor development. A study in off-vine ripened tomatoes confirmed that the fruit presented reduced VOC emission and a low sugar/acid ratio, due to alterations in gene expression and decreased methylation of their promoters . Genomic resources can help anticipate consumer preference and assist in breeding to select fruit with enhanced flavor. A population genomic study revealed that distinct consumer preferences between eastern and western countries drove selection for peach cultivars with different acidity . Fruit VOC profile data can help predict consumer liking before performing sensory panels, allowing for a more efficient selection of high-flavor fruit, as seen in tomato and blueberry . Moreover, the tomato pan-genome helped identify a rare favorable allele selected against during domestication that could be incorporated back into new cultivars to improve fruit flavor .Fruit texture is associated with freshness, flavor, and shelf-life potential. Texture involves many attributes, such as firmness, juiciness, crispiness, and meltiness . Fruit softening is mainly attributed to the remodeling and degradation of the polysaccharides in the primary cell walls .

The cuticle layer, deposited on the CWs of epidermal tissue, also contributes to fruit firmness by preventing water loss and maintaining cell turgor pressure . Traditional breeding has focused on creating firmer fruit that withstand transportation and have longer shelf life. This has been accomplished in tomato by developing hybrid lines between elite varieties and non-ripening mutants such as ripening-inhibitor and non-ripening . These mutants have defects in TFs considered master regulators of many ripening processes,plastic plant pot including the induction of cell wall-degrading enzymes and changes in cuticle composition . Other efforts to improve firmness and shelf life in climacteric fruit have taken advantage of mutations affecting ethylene biosynthesis and perception, as this hormone is also known to regulate genes encoding CWDEs, among others . However, as already discussed, modulating master regulators or hormone pathways has numerous drawbacks to other quality traits, such as color and flavor. Thus, downstream TFs controlling specific CW enzymes, such as LOB TF in tomato, may prove to be better targets . Another possibility is to leverage the availability of natural or induced allelic variants in ripening master regulators to produce a range of fruit phenotypes. For example, spontaneous or equivalent delayed fruit deterioration and CRISPR–Cas9-generated mutations in the ripening regulator NOR can extend shelf life with minimal impact on other fruit attributes , compared with the canonical mutant nor . RNAi and gene editing approaches have been used to target ripening-specific CWDEs that influence fruit firmness, such as polygalacturonase , pectate lyase , and pectin methyl esterase . The first GM fruit product, the FLAVR SAVR™ tomato, was engineered with antisense RNA against SlPG, however, it did not show a phenotype for fruit firmness . In contrast, the CRISPR–Cas9 SlPL knockout in tomato significantly improved fruit firmness and shelf life . Similar observations were previously reported in strawberry using RNAi knockdowns of FvPL and FvPME. In addition to firmer fruit, tomato and strawberry SlPL mutants have reduced fruit susceptibility to fungal disease . Breeding strategies and molecular studies have also focused on ameliorating textural defects such as fruit mealiness caused by cold storage. Mealiness, considered the opposite of juiciness, occurs when neighboring cells lose adhesion and detach while remaining intact . In peach, quantitative trait loci associated with cold-tolerant varieties have been identified to support breeding for less mealy fruit . Beyond QTLs, understanding the genetic mechanisms behind the trait provides avenues for targeting breeding and genetic modifications. For instance, peach mealiness appears to be associated with increased DNA methylation, leading to the downregulation and hypermethylation of mealy-associated genes such as PpCYP82A3 . Finding molecular approaches to avoid the deposition of methyl groups in the promoters of key ripening genes in response to cold storage can serve as a potential solution to mealiness.The FLAVR SAVR™ tomato hit the market in the early 90s promising a product with longer shelf life. However, this GM fruit had high production costs and was not well accepted by consumers, which led to its removal from the marketplace . Since then, other bioengineered crops with improved plant disease resistance or production-related traits have become available worldwide . These products have not sparked much enthusiasm mainly because they were not generated considering consumer-based traits or due to public fear of GM organisms. Recently, two fruits bio-engineered for quality attributes were approved by both US and Canadian regulatory entities and are available to consumers. These are the Pinkglow™ pineapple and the Arctic™ apple. The latter was bioengineering to reduce oxidative browning in the cut fruit . These fruit are considered novelty items because they are less available in the marketplace and significantly more expensive than traditional cultivars. Both fruits are primarily sold online and offered in limited supplies. The Pinkglow™ pineapple costs nearly ten times more than a common yellow pineapple. Despite their limitations, these fruits were developed with the consumer in mind, which may entice the public more than previous GM products.In 2022, the USDA deregulated the purple tomato developed with the expression of two snapdragon TFs. Novel fruit colors and potential higher nutrition may draw consumers to a new emerging category of bio-engineered produce. These fruit will also need to meet high consumer expectations of flavor, affordability, and food safety to ensure their success. Gene editing techniques such as CRISPR–Cas9 enable the fine-tuning of quality traits in a variety of fruit crops and may be more well received than previous GM products. For example, Japan started selling the first Cas9-edited fruit in the world in 2021, a health-promoting γ-aminobutyric acid -enriched tomato . Gene-edited fruit without foreign DNA have a more straightforward regulatory path in the United States than GM products, increasing the speed to market and reducing costs associated with authorization. However, this is not the case in other parts of the world, such as the European Union. In conclusion, researchers are armed with knowledge on fruit ripening and tools to improve fruit quality and generate greater access to fresh, flavorful, and nutritious food. Demands for better-tasting, more sustainable fruit, are in reach . We sit on the edge of an era where gene-edited and bio-engineered commodities can become a new category in the market, if the consumer will allow it.Fleshy fruit gain most of their quality traits, such as color, texture, flavor, and nutritional value, as a result of physiological and biochemical changes associated with ripening.

The best time of year to start citrus or avocado seedlings is in early spring

Firms that had made investments that led to higher worker productivity should have wanted to advertise that information in order to convince workers that they should accept a lower piece rate, while firms that had not should have wanted to hide the fact. Newman and Jarvis also found that piece rates were adjusted in many packing sheds if the quantity and/or quality of the grapes being processed changed. Although strikes were legally prohibited, female workers were able to “stop” production and successfully negotiate an increase in the piece rate, and the reverse was also true. Indeed, several male shed managers said that they found it easier to negotiate a “fair” piece rate with women than to negotiate pay with men. The evidence in Newman and Jarvis suggested that women workers were both aware of the importance of firm-influenced productivity differences and able to obtain information about what firms actually provided. Thus, there was evidence that female workers operated within and were part of a highly sophisticated labor market in which firms and workers obtained and used information regarding about their heterogeneity. Neither workers nor firms thought that firms or workers were homogeneous.Each worker was asked how many months he/she would have liked to work during 1991 and 1992. The mean response by females was 11.1 months and 9.7 months, respectively. The responses were surprisingly high, round flower buckets given that most women had worked much less than this in 1991. The question did not specify a wage at which they would be employed, but the responses suggested that most women wanted to work most of the year.

To further explore workers’ preferences for seasonal as opposed to permanent employment, including a specified wage, each worker was asked to indicate her/his preference for one of three employment options: 1) 3 months employment per year at100,000 pesos per month, 2) 6 months employment at 60,000 pesos per month, and 3) 12 months employment at 35,000 pesos per month. Option 2) required twice the time to obtain an additional 60,000 pesos of annual income, as did option 3). When the options were designed, it was believed that most women preferred to work only the summer months and thus would choose the first option. In fact, 50% of workers chose permanent employment as their preferred option and an additional 25% choose the 6-month option. Only 25% choose the 3-month high-salary option, even though its 300,000-peso salary turned out to significantly exceed the mean annual earnings of workers. What do these answers mean? We believe, based on respondents’ anecdotal comments, that most female temporary agricultural laborers want to work most of the year. First, most women wanted to earn more, even if the marginal earnings associated with longer employment were low. Second, some women expressed a desire to spread their income throughout the year and thought that a permanent salary would help achieve this. They commented on how hard it was for them to adequately carry funds from one month to the next given a lack of accessible savings institutions1 and constant pressure from friends and relatives for loans and assistance. Third, many women said that they enjoyed working, particularly as it allowed them to feel productive, benefit economically, and have greater social contact with others. When asked what they liked about their work, some women responded simply that they enjoyed it. However, most provided additional insight into what the work experience meant for them. Some responded that work allowed them to financially help their families, others that they enjoyed socializing with other women, having an opportunity to talk about their problems, possible solutions, and simply their concerns, and to form personal connections that they could not otherwise make.

Others were glad simply to feel useful. Having said that women wanted additional employment, they were not idle. Combining employment and family responsibilities placed a harsh demand on women’s time and energy. Their summer work schedule was especially grueling. They worked very long hours. Processing sheds began work at 2:00 p.m. and continued until all of the grapes picked had been packed. On average, cleaners worked 9.6 hours per day and packers 10.3 hours, not counting time waiting for the sheds to open, or for coffee breaks and dinner. Work commonly finished well after midnight and, during the seasonal peak, as late as 6:00 a.m. Many females liked beginning work in the early afternoon because it gave them time to take care of family responsibilities in the morning. Women also mentioned the burden that they faced in meeting these dual responsibilities. Some women indicated that their husbands did not want them to work and a few said they had obtained agreement to work only during peak season when earnings were high. However, more women indicated that their husbands appreciated their income, recognized that it improved family welfare, and supported their working. A few women said that their husbands had accepted some household tasks to help. All of the women interviewed worked at a task that was paid on a piece rate basis most of the time. Despite the increased pressure and expenditure of effort that piece rate work required, when asked their preference for summer work, 58% of workers expressed a preference for piece rate pay when working in a packing shed during the summer. The overwhelming reason for preferring piece rate pay was that it allowed the worker to earn more. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of these workers would have preferred a salaried job during the summer and most did not want piece rate employment on a year round basis. Indeed, 61% of workers preferred a fixed wage if they could get a year around job. Roughly half said they did not want to work at the intense pace required by piece rate work on a continuing basis. Others commented that they felt that they would earn more if working for a wage, including some who said that they would earn a higher rate for overtime, while others said their earnings would be more stable. The workers interviewed understood the advantages and disadvantages of their various employment options. Their decision to accept piece rate work depended partly on a lack of other remunerative employment during the rest of the year. Their relative poverty contributed to their desire to work hard when an employment opportunity presented itself. One might expect the supply of labor for temporary agricultural work on a piece rate basis will decrease if and when other employment opportunities materialize.Many women entered the labor force to supplement the income of other family members and/or to satisfy their own special needs. However, a majority of women in our data set were the major income earner in their household. Approximately 180 women lived in households that contained no male workers. Another 25% of women were the primary earner in their households even though their households included an adult male who worked at least part of the time. We lacked data to test whether women’s acceptance of temporary work in the fruit sector had improved household income. We only observed the households in which female workers resided, not the households they resided in prior to obtaining employment, plastic flower buckets wholesale and we had no information on rural families that did not have any members working in the fruit sector. It is nonetheless instructive to see how the income earned by women in our sample affected their current households.It is often tempting, after eating a particularly good orange or avocado, to plant the seed and grow your own tree full of these delicious fruit. Trees grown from these seed, however, may produce fruit that are not edible at all, or the trees may not bear fruit for many years.

The best way to produce good-quality fruit is to grow seedlings from them and then attach, by budding or grafting, material from trees that are known to be good producers. Budding and grafting can also be used to change or add varieties to mature citrus or avocado trees, a process known as top working. This publication is a brief introduction to budding and grafting for the home gardener. For more information, consult the materials listed at the end of this publication or contact your local Cooperative Extension office.To germinate citrus or avocado seed, plant them in a shallow container such as a nursery flat or a pan with drainage holes in well-drained commercial potting mix. Plant the seed two to three times deeper than their length. For example, a citrus seed about 1 ⁄4 inch long should be planted about 1 ⁄2 to 3 ⁄4 inch deep. Keep the seed in a warm place—between 70° and 80°F —and keep the soil moist. Covering the nursery flats with clear glass or plastic will help maintain the proper humidity. Avocado seed can also be germinated by suspending them in water. Place toothpicks horizontally into the seed near the top. Suspend the wide end of the seed in a small container of water with the toothpicks resting on the edge of the container. Place it in indirect light and refresh the water at least weekly. After germination , replant the seedlings into a larger container of good-quality commercial potting mix. Good choices for containers include a cardboard milk carton cut horizontally in half or a one-gallon can. Punch drain holes in the bottom of the container. The seedling will be ready for budding or grafting when it has grown to 24 to 30 inches tall.Budding and grafting are vegetative propagation techniques in which a single bud or stem of a desired plant is attached to a rootstock plant. In budding, a single bud with its accompanying bark is used as the scion. In grafting, part of a stem or branch is used as the scion. One of the most important keys to successful budding and grafting is properly positioning the scion on the rootstock. In order for the scion and rootstock to grow together, the thin greenish plant layer just under the bark of the scion and rootstock must be aligned so that they touch each other. If they do not touch each other, the bud or graft will fail. Within 10 to 15 days, a successful bud or graft forms a hard whitish tissue where the two cambium layers grow together. Always use sharp cutting or grafting instruments and make clean, even cuts. Options include a budding knife, a sharp kitchen knife, or a single-sided razor blade. Do not allow the cut surfaces of the scion or rootstock to dry out: immerse cut scions in a pail of water, wrap them in plastic, or graft them immediately after cutting. Also, remove any leaves from scions after cutting to help keep the scions from losing water. Keep the scions in a cool place during the work.Budding and grafting are best done in the spring or fall when the bark is easily separated from the wood. It should be timed to be early enough so that warm weather will help ensure a good bud union, yet late enough so that the bud will not begin to grow and callus will not grow over the bud itself. Citrus budded or grafted in the fall must be protected from frost. Avocados are best grafted in the spring when the bark is easily separated from the wood.Budding is the standard method used to propagate citrus. Aside from being the easiest method, it allows a large number of plants to be propagated from a small amount of scion wood and is suitable for trees, rootstocks, or branches from 1 ⁄4 to 1 inch in diameter. Budwood should be taken only from high-producing, disease-free trees . The best citrus budwood is located just below the most recent flush of new growth; the best avocado budwood is located near the terminal end of shoots that have fully matured, leathery leaves.Cultivated alfalfa is a major forage crop that plays a key role in global livestock production. Alfalfa hay is a relatively cheap, high-quality forage which is high in protein and thus an ideal feed for ruminant animals . Often referred to as the ‘Queen of forages’, alfalfa is one of California’s most important crops, driving production of the state’s most significant agricultural enterprise: dairy . In 2022, 200,000 hectares of alfalfa were harvested for hay and haylage with a total value of over $1B .